🇮🇳 MH CET Law · subject

MH CET Law Logical and Analytical Reasoning Syllabus

Every chapter and topic of Logical and Analytical Reasoning examined in MH CET Law — 5 chapters, 22 topics and 6 sub-topics, plus 58 flashcards written against it.

5Chapters
22Topics
6Sub-topics
~20hEst. first pass
20%Of MH CET Law
58Flashcards

Logical and Analytical Reasoning syllabus — full chapter and topic list

Expand any chapter to see its topics and sub-topics. This is the whole examinable outline for Logical and Analytical Reasoning in MH CET Law, not a summary of it.

  1. Verbal Logical Reasoning

    5 topics
    • Syllogisms
      • Standard categorical syllogisms
      • Possibility and Venn-based deductions
    • Statements and Assumptions
    • Statements, Inferences and Conclusions
    • Courses of Action and Argument Strength
    • Cause and Effect Relationships
  2. Analytical Puzzles

    5 topics
    • Seating Arrangements
      • Linear arrangements
      • Circular and rectangular arrangements
    • Blood Relations
    • Direction Sense
    • Ordering, Ranking and Grouping
    • Distribution and Scheduling Puzzles
  3. Coding and Series Reasoning

    4 topics
    • Coding-Decoding
      • Letter and number coding
      • Symbol and conditional coding
    • Number, Letter and Alphabet Series
    • Analogy and Classification
    • Series Completion and Missing Terms
  4. Critical Reasoning

    4 topics
    • Strengthening and Weakening Arguments
    • Identifying Assumptions and Conclusions
    • Flaws and Logical Fallacies
    • Paradox and Inference Questions
  5. Data and Pattern Analysis

    4 topics
    • Data Sufficiency
    • Logical Venn Diagrams
    • Mathematical Operations and Inequalities
    • Input-Output and Sequencing

Logical and Analytical Reasoning flashcards for MH CET Law

22 of 58 cards from the Logical and Analytical Reasoning deck — real questions with worked answers.

  1. In syllogisms, what is the only valid conclusion type from two universal affirmative premises like 'All A are B' and 'All B are C'?

    A universal affirmative: 'All A are C.' Two universals yield a universal; the chain passes through the common middle term B.

  2. State the cardinal syllogism rule about the middle term.

    The middle term must be distributed at least once across the two premises; otherwise no valid conclusion follows (fallacy of the undistributed middle).

  3. In syllogisms, what can you conclude from two negative premises?

    Nothing. Two negative premises yield no valid conclusion.

  4. In syllogisms, what can you conclude from two particular premises (e.g., 'Some A are B', 'Some B are C')?

    No definite conclusion. Two particular premises give no valid conclusion.

  5. In syllogism rules, if one premise is negative, what must the conclusion be?

    The conclusion must also be negative. If one premise is particular, the conclusion must be particular.

  6. What is a 'complementary pair' (either-or) conclusion in syllogisms?

    When neither single statement follows but two possibilities like 'Some A are B' and 'Some A are not B' together exhaust the cases, the 'Either...or' conclusion is valid (I-O or A-O pairs over the same terms).

  7. In Statements and Assumptions, what is an 'assumption'?

    An assumption is something taken for granted or supposed — an unstated idea the author must believe for the statement to make sense or hold true.

  8. What is the key test to decide if an assumption is implicit in a statement?

    Negate the assumption; if its negation makes the statement fall apart or become illogical, the assumption is implicit. Otherwise it is not.

  9. In Statements and Assumptions, are facts already stated in the statement valid assumptions?

    No. An assumption must be unstated/hidden. Anything explicitly given in the statement cannot be the assumption.

  10. What distinguishes an 'inference' from a 'conclusion' in reasoning questions?

    An inference is a logical extension drawn from facts (probable, going beyond what is stated); a conclusion is what definitely follows/can be directly derived from the given statement.

  11. In 'Statement and Course of Action', when does a course of action follow?

    When it is a practical, logical step that addresses the problem and is likely to improve or resolve the situation described — not extreme, impractical, or out of proportion.

  12. In Course of Action questions, why are extreme actions (e.g., 'ban completely', 'punish everyone') usually rejected?

    Because valid courses of action should be practical, feasible, and proportionate; extreme or sweeping measures are generally not considered logical solutions.

  13. Define 'argument strength' criteria: what makes an argument 'strong'?

    A strong argument is directly related to the question, factually/logically sound, and addresses the issue substantively. A weak argument is irrelevant, trivial, ambiguous, or based on assumptions.

  14. In Cause and Effect questions, what is the cause and what is the effect?

    The cause is the event/action that happens first and brings about a result; the effect is the consequence that follows from the cause.

  15. In Cause and Effect, what does it mean when two events are 'independent causes'?

    Both events occur due to some common/third independent cause, and neither is the cause or effect of the other.

  16. In Seating Arrangement (circular, facing center), how do left and right relate to your view?

    For people facing the center, their left is your right and their right is your left — directions are reversed relative to an outside observer.

  17. In a circular arrangement of n people, how many people sit between two given persons going one way vs the other?

    If k people sit between them one way, then (n − 2 − k) people sit between them the other way.

  18. In Blood Relations, who is your father's brother's wife to you?

    Your aunt (specifically your uncle's wife / paternal aunt by marriage).

  19. In Blood Relations, what relation is your mother's brother to you, and his children?

    Mother's brother is your maternal uncle; his children are your cousins.

  20. In Blood Relations coding (pointing puzzles), what does 'She is the only daughter of my mother' indicate?

    The person referred to is the speaker herself (if speaker is female) or the speaker's sister — i.e., the only daughter is the speaker/sister in that generation.

  21. In Blood Relations, what is your son's wife and your daughter's husband called?

    Son's wife is your daughter-in-law; daughter's husband is your son-in-law.

  22. In Direction Sense, name the four cardinal and four ordinal (intermediate) directions.

    Cardinal: North, South, East, West. Ordinal: North-East, North-West, South-East, South-West.

See more Logical and Analytical Reasoning flashcards →

Planning Logical and Analytical Reasoning for MH CET Law

Logical and Analytical Reasoning is about 20% of the MH CET Law syllabus by topic count — 22 of 110 topics, spread over 5 chapters. At roughly 45 minutes per topic plus 12 minutes per sub-topic, a first pass runs to about 20 hours.

The heaviest chapters are Verbal Logical Reasoning (5 topics), Analytical Puzzles (5 topics), Coding and Series Reasoning (4 topics) . Front-load those while your energy is high; the short chapters are better revision filler later.

Work top-down: read the chapter, then tick topics off individually rather than marking the whole chapter done. Sub-topics are where silent gaps hide.

Logical and Analytical Reasoning (MH CET Law) FAQ

What is in the MH CET Law Logical and Analytical Reasoning syllabus?

Logical and Analytical Reasoning is split into 5 chapters — Verbal Logical Reasoning, Analytical Puzzles, Coding and Series Reasoning, Critical Reasoning and Data and Pattern Analysis, containing 22 topics and 6 sub-topics in total.

How many chapters are there in Logical and Analytical Reasoning for MH CET Law?

5 chapters. Logical and Analytical Reasoning accounts for about 20% of the topics in the whole MH CET Law syllabus (22 of 110).

How long should I spend on Logical and Analytical Reasoning for MH CET Law?

Budget around 20 hours for a first pass through Logical and Analytical Reasoning — about 45 minutes per topic plus 12 minutes per sub-topic across its 22 topics. Add revision cycles on top.

Are there flashcards for MH CET Law Logical and Analytical Reasoning?

Yes — a 58-card Logical and Analytical Reasoning deck. Sample cards are printed on this page, and the full deck is free in the Examius app with spaced repetition scheduling.