Examius
🇮🇳 XAT · flashcards
XAT Verbal and Logical Ability Flashcards
53 question-and-answer cards covering Verbal and Logical Ability as it is examined in XAT. 24 of them are printed below, taken from across the deck — no signup, no paywall on the preview.
24 sample cards from the Verbal and Logical Ability deck
Sampled from the end of the deck, so these are different cards from the ones shown on the syllabus page.
Distinguish 'principal' and 'principle'.
'Principal' = chief/most important, or the head of a school, or a sum of money; 'principle' = a fundamental rule or belief.
Distinguish 'complement' and 'compliment'.
'Complement' = something that completes or goes well with (the wine complements the meal); 'compliment' = an expression of praise.
Distinguish 'stationary' and 'stationery'.
'Stationary' = not moving; 'stationery' = writing materials such as paper and pens.
Distinguish 'elicit' and 'illicit'.
'Elicit' is a verb meaning to draw out a response; 'illicit' is an adjective meaning illegal or forbidden.
Distinguish 'discreet' and 'discrete'.
'Discreet' = careful, tactful, prudent in speech; 'discrete' = separate, individually distinct.
What is a para-jumble (sentence rearrangement) question and what is the goal?
It gives 4-6 jumbled sentences that must be reordered into a coherent paragraph. The goal is to find the logical and grammatical sequence that creates a unified flow of ideas.
List the main clues used to solve para-jumbles.
Identify the opening/independent sentence, track pronoun references and their antecedents, follow transition/linking words, note chronological or cause-effect order, and locate the concluding sentence.
In para-jumbles, how do you identify the likely opening sentence?
It introduces the topic independently, contains no backward-referring pronouns (it, this, they, such), no connectors (however, therefore), and usually presents a general idea or a noun in full form rather than a pronoun.
What is the role of 'mandatory pairs' (sentence links) in solving para-jumbles?
Mandatory pairs are two sentences that must be adjacent because one logically/grammatically depends on the other (e.g., a statement and its direct elaboration); fixing the pair narrows the possible orderings quickly.
What is a 'paragraph completion' (last/concluding sentence) question?
A paragraph is given with the final sentence missing, and you must choose the option that best concludes it by maintaining the tone, logic and direction of the argument without introducing new, unsupported ideas.
In paragraph completion, why are options that introduce a new topic usually wrong?
A concluding or filling sentence must continue the existing line of thought; an option that introduces an unrelated new idea breaks the paragraph's coherence and is therefore incorrect.
In critical reasoning, what are the three core components of an argument?
Premise (evidence/reason given), conclusion (the claim being supported), and assumption (the unstated link that connects premises to the conclusion).
In critical reasoning, what does it mean to 'strengthen' versus 'weaken' an argument?
Strengthening adds support that makes the conclusion more likely (often by affirming the assumption); weakening introduces information that undermines the conclusion (often by attacking the assumption).
What is a 'necessary assumption' in critical reasoning?
A premise that must be true for the argument's conclusion to hold; if it were false, the argument would collapse. The negation test confirms it: negating a necessary assumption destroys the argument.
Name common logical fallacies tested in critical reasoning.
Ad hominem (attacking the person), straw man (misrepresenting the argument), false cause/correlation-causation, circular reasoning, hasty generalisation, false dilemma, and appeal to authority.
In 'statement and argument' questions, what makes an argument 'strong' versus 'weak'?
A strong argument is directly related to the statement, logical, and based on relevant facts/significant consequences; a weak argument is irrelevant, ambiguous, superficial, or based on an individual opinion or trivial point.
In 'statement and assumptions' questions, what is the test for whether an assumption is implicit?
An assumption is implicit only if it is necessarily taken for granted for the statement to make sense; do not assume something just because it is plausible or generally true.
What is the difference between 'inference' and 'conclusion' in statement-based logic questions?
A conclusion is a summarising judgement that can be directly drawn from the stated facts; an inference is an extension that logically follows beyond what is stated. Conclusions stay closer to the text than inferences.
In poem/literary interpretation, what are the key elements to analyse?
Theme (central idea), tone/mood, imagery, figures of speech (metaphor, simile, personification), symbolism, and the speaker's perspective or attitude.
Define the figures of speech metaphor, simile, and personification.
Metaphor = direct comparison without 'like/as' (Time is a thief); simile = comparison using 'like/as' (brave as a lion); personification = giving human qualities to non-human things (the wind whispered).
In the classic FIJ framework, define a Fact, an Inference, and a Judgement.
Fact = a verifiable observation or known matter; Inference = a logical conclusion drawn from facts or observations; Judgement = an opinion, approval/disapproval or value-based intention about a situation.
In 'Fact, Inference, Judgement' questions, how do you distinguish an inference from a judgement?
An inference is a reasoned conclusion grounded in given facts and is logically defensible; a judgement is a subjective opinion or evaluative stance that reflects approval, disapproval or a value claim, not pure logic.
In verbal analogies, what is the standard approach to solving them?
Determine the precise relationship between the first pair (e.g., synonym, antonym, cause-effect, part-whole, worker-tool, degree), express it as a sentence, then find the option pair that shares the exact same relationship in the same order.
Name five common relationship types tested in word analogies.
Synonym/antonym, part-to-whole, cause-and-effect, object-to-function (or worker-to-tool), and category-to-example (genus-species); also degree/intensity (e.g., warm:hot).
What this deck covers
The Verbal and Logical Ability deck follows the XAT Verbal and Logical Ability syllabus — 4 chapters and 16 topics — so questions land on material that is genuinely examinable rather than trivia around it. That works out to roughly 13.3 cards per chapter.
Answers are written to be recallable, not just readable — averaging about 179 characters, which is long enough to carry the reasoning and short enough to say out loud.
A deck like this earns its keep on the second and third pass. Read the syllabus first so you know the shape of the subject, then use the cards to find the specific facts that have not stuck.
Verbal and Logical Ability flashcards FAQ
How many Verbal and Logical Ability flashcards are in this XAT deck?
53 cards. This page previews 24 of them, sampled evenly across the deck so you can judge the difficulty before installing anything.
Are these XAT flashcards free?
Yes. The preview here is free to read with no signup, and the full 53-card deck is free inside the Examius app.
What do the Verbal and Logical Ability cards cover?
They follow the XAT Verbal and Logical Ability syllabus — 4 chapters and 16 topics — so the questions track what is actually examinable.
How should I use these flashcards?
Read the syllabus first so you know the shape of the subject, then drill the deck. Examius schedules each card with spaced repetition, so cards you keep missing come back sooner and ones you know drift further apart.