🇬🇧 Statistical Officer / Government Statistical Service (GSS) Assessment · flashcards

Statistical Officer / Government Statistical Service (GSS) Assessment Probability and Statistical Inference Flashcards

54 question-and-answer cards covering Probability and Statistical Inference as it is examined in Statistical Officer / Government Statistical Service (GSS) Assessment. 24 of them are printed below, taken from across the deck — no signup, no paywall on the preview.

54Cards in deck
24Free preview
12Syllabus topics
~204Chars per answer
FreePrice

24 sample cards from the Probability and Statistical Inference deck

Sampled from the end of the deck, so these are different cards from the ones shown on the syllabus page.

  1. When should the $t$-distribution be used instead of the normal for inference about a mean?

    When the population standard deviation $\sigma$ is unknown and estimated by $s$ (especially with small $n$). Use $t = \dfrac{\bar{X} - \mu}{s / \sqrt{n}}$ with $n - 1$ degrees of freedom. As $n \to \infty$ the $t$-distribution approaches $N(0,1)$.

  2. Define what makes an estimator unbiased.

    An estimator $\hat{\theta}$ is unbiased if $E[\hat{\theta}] = \theta$ for all $\theta$; that is, its expected value equals the true parameter. The bias is $E[\hat{\theta}] - \theta$.

  3. Why is the sample variance defined with divisor $n - 1$ rather than $n$?

    Dividing by $n - 1$ (Bessel's correction) makes $s^{2} = \dfrac{1}{n-1}\sum (x_i - \bar{x})^{2}$ an unbiased estimator of $\sigma^{2}$; dividing by $n$ underestimates the variance on average.

  4. What is the mean squared error (MSE) of an estimator, and how does it decompose?

    $\text{MSE}(\hat{\theta}) = E[(\hat{\theta} - \theta)^{2}] = \operatorname{Var}(\hat{\theta}) + [\text{Bias}(\hat{\theta})]^{2}$. It captures the bias–variance trade-off.

  5. Define a consistent estimator.

    An estimator $\hat{\theta}_n$ is consistent if it converges in probability to $\theta$ as $n \to \infty$: for any $\varepsilon > 0$, $P(|\hat{\theta}_n - \theta| > \varepsilon) \to 0$. Loosely, more data makes it arbitrarily accurate.

  6. Describe the principle of maximum likelihood estimation (MLE).

    Choose the parameter value $\hat{\theta}$ that maximizes the likelihood $L(\theta) = \prod_i f(x_i; \theta)$ (or, equivalently, the log-likelihood $\ell(\theta) = \sum_i \log f(x_i; \theta)$) given the observed data.

  7. What is an efficient estimator, and what does the Cramér–Rao lower bound give?

    An efficient estimator achieves the smallest possible variance among unbiased estimators. The Cramér–Rao lower bound states that for an unbiased $\hat{\theta}$, $\operatorname{Var}(\hat{\theta}) \geq \dfrac{1}{I(\theta)}$, where $I(\theta)$ is the Fisher information.

  8. Give the general form of a confidence interval for a population mean when $\sigma$ is known.

    $\bar{x} \pm z_{\alpha/2}\,\dfrac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}$, where $z_{\alpha/2}$ is the standard normal critical value (e.g. $1.96$ for $95\%$ confidence).

  9. Give the confidence interval for a mean when $\sigma$ is unknown (small sample, normal population).

    $\bar{x} \pm t_{\alpha/2,\, n-1}\,\dfrac{s}{\sqrt{n}}$, using the $t$-distribution with $n - 1$ degrees of freedom.

  10. What is the correct frequentist interpretation of a 95% confidence interval?

    If the sampling procedure were repeated many times, about $95\%$ of the constructed intervals would contain the true parameter. It does NOT mean there is a $95\%$ probability the parameter lies in this particular interval (the parameter is fixed).

  11. Give the confidence interval for a population proportion $p$ (large-sample, Wald interval).

    $\hat{p} \pm z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\dfrac{\hat{p}(1 - \hat{p})}{n}}$, where $\hat{p}$ is the sample proportion.

  12. What is the margin of error in a confidence interval, and how does it scale with sample size?

    The margin of error is the half-width, e.g. $z_{\alpha/2}\,\dfrac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}$. It is proportional to $\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{n}}$, so quadrupling the sample size halves the margin of error.

  13. Derive the sample size needed to estimate a mean with margin of error $E$ (known $\sigma$).

    From $E = z_{\alpha/2}\,\dfrac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}$, solve $n = \left(\dfrac{z_{\alpha/2}\,\sigma}{E}\right)^{2}$, rounding up to the next integer.

  14. What sample size is needed to estimate a proportion with margin $E$, and what value of $p$ is most conservative?

    $n = \dfrac{z_{\alpha/2}^{2}\,p(1 - p)}{E^{2}}$. The worst case is $p = 0.5$ (maximizing $p(1-p) = 0.25$), giving the largest, most conservative sample size.

  15. How do precision and confidence level trade off for a fixed sample size?

    Increasing the confidence level (e.g. $95\% \to 99\%$) widens the interval, reducing precision; narrowing the interval lowers confidence. To improve both simultaneously you must increase $n$.

  16. List the steps in the framework of a significance (hypothesis) test.

    (1) State $H_0$ and $H_1$; (2) choose significance level $\alpha$; (3) select and compute a test statistic; (4) determine the rejection region or $p$-value; (5) decide to reject or fail to reject $H_0$; (6) interpret in context.

  17. Define a Type I error and a Type II error.

    Type I error: rejecting $H_0$ when it is true (probability $\alpha$, the significance level). Type II error: failing to reject $H_0$ when it is false (probability $\beta$).

  18. Define the power of a statistical test and how it relates to $\beta$.

    Power $= 1 - \beta = P(\text{reject } H_0 \mid H_0 \text{ false})$ — the probability of correctly detecting a true effect. Power increases with larger sample size, larger effect size, and larger $\alpha$.

  19. Define the $p$-value precisely.

    The $p$-value is the probability, assuming $H_0$ is true, of obtaining a test statistic at least as extreme as the one observed. A small $p$-value indicates the data are unlikely under $H_0$. Reject $H_0$ if $p \leq \alpha$.

  20. Which significance test is appropriate for comparing two independent sample means, and what is its statistic?

    The two-sample (independent) $t$-test: $t = \dfrac{\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2}{\sqrt{\dfrac{s_1^{2}}{n_1} + \dfrac{s_2^{2}}{n_2}}}$ (Welch's form). Use a paired $t$-test instead when observations are matched.

  21. What does a chi-squared ($\chi^{2}$) test assess, and what is its statistic?

    It tests goodness-of-fit or independence in categorical data using $\chi^{2} = \sum \dfrac{(O - E)^{2}}{E}$, where $O$ are observed and $E$ are expected frequencies. For an $r \times c$ table of independence, degrees of freedom $= (r - 1)(c - 1)$.

  22. Explain the distinction between statistical significance and practical (substantive) significance.

    Statistical significance means an effect is unlikely due to chance ($p \leq \alpha$); practical significance concerns whether the effect is large enough to matter. With very large $n$, trivially small effects can be statistically significant yet practically meaningless.

  23. Describe the multiple comparisons problem and a common correction.

    Performing many tests inflates the family-wise Type I error rate: at $\alpha = 0.05$, about 1 in 20 true nulls is wrongly rejected by chance. The Bonferroni correction tests each of $m$ hypotheses at $\dfrac{\alpha}{m}$ to control the overall error rate.

  24. What is the difference between correlation and causation, and why does it matter in inference?

    Correlation measures association between variables; it does not establish that one causes the other. Confounding variables or reverse causation can produce association without causation — causal claims require controlled experiments or careful design, not just observed correlation.

What this deck covers

The Probability and Statistical Inference deck follows the Statistical Officer / Government Statistical Service (GSS) Assessment Probability and Statistical Inference syllabus — 4 chapters and 12 topics — so questions land on material that is genuinely examinable rather than trivia around it. That works out to roughly 13.5 cards per chapter.

Answers are written to be recallable, not just readable — averaging about 204 characters, which is long enough to carry the reasoning and short enough to say out loud.

A deck like this earns its keep on the second and third pass. Read the syllabus first so you know the shape of the subject, then use the cards to find the specific facts that have not stuck.

Probability and Statistical Inference flashcards FAQ

How many Probability and Statistical Inference flashcards are in this Statistical Officer / Government Statistical Service (GSS) Assessment deck?

54 cards. This page previews 24 of them, sampled evenly across the deck so you can judge the difficulty before installing anything.

Are these Statistical Officer / Government Statistical Service (GSS) Assessment flashcards free?

Yes. The preview here is free to read with no signup, and the full 54-card deck is free inside the Examius app.

What do the Probability and Statistical Inference cards cover?

They follow the Statistical Officer / Government Statistical Service (GSS) Assessment Probability and Statistical Inference syllabus — 4 chapters and 12 topics — so the questions track what is actually examinable.

How should I use these flashcards?

Read the syllabus first so you know the shape of the subject, then drill the deck. Examius schedules each card with spaced repetition, so cards you keep missing come back sooner and ones you know drift further apart.