🇮🇳 SNAP · flashcards
SNAP Data Interpretation and Data Sufficiency Flashcards
51 question-and-answer cards covering Data Interpretation and Data Sufficiency as it is examined in SNAP. 24 of them are printed below, taken from across the deck — no signup, no paywall on the preview.
24 sample cards from the Data Interpretation and Data Sufficiency deck
Sampled from the end of the deck, so these are different cards from the ones shown on the syllabus page.
What is Reasoning-Based DI?
Reasoning-Based DI gives data with missing or coded values and conditions/clues; you must use logical deduction (like in puzzles) to fill in the data before or while interpreting it.
How does Reasoning-Based DI differ from calculation-based DI?
Calculation-based DI focuses on arithmetic on fully given data, while reasoning-based DI requires logical deduction from clues to determine the data itself, blending puzzle-solving with interpretation.
What is the recommended strategy when starting a reasoning-based DI set with incomplete data?
Begin from the most definite clues (fixed or unique conditions), establish those values first, then use them to deduce remaining unknowns step by step.
What is approximation in Data Interpretation and why is it used?
Approximation is rounding figures to convenient values to speed up calculation; it is used because DI answer options are usually spread apart, so an estimate is enough to pick the correct option.
When approximating, why should you check how close the answer options are before rounding aggressively?
If options are far apart you can round heavily, but if options are close you must keep more precision, otherwise rounding may push you to the wrong nearby option.
A good shortcut for approximating large divisions in DI is what?
Round both numerator and denominator to easy figures (e.g., to the nearest 10, 100, or simple fraction) and simplify, then adjust the estimate slightly for the rounding done.
What is the shortcut to find x% of a number using the y% of x = x% of y rule?
a% of b equals b% of a. For example, 16% of 25 = 25% of 16 = 4, which is far easier to compute.
How do you quickly increase a quantity by a percentage using a multiplying factor?
Multiply by (1 + p/100). For example, increasing by 20% means multiplying by 1.20; decreasing by 20% means multiplying by 0.80.
What is the successive percentage change formula for two changes a% and b%?
Net change % = a + b + (a x b)/100, using the sign of each change (positive for increase, negative for decrease).
How can a ratio a:b be converted into each part's percentage of the whole?
Part's percentage = (its share / sum of ratio terms) x 100. For a:b, first part = a/(a+b) x 100 and second = b/(a+b) x 100.
What is a fast way to compare two fractions to decide which is larger in DI?
Use cross-multiplication: for a/b vs c/d, compare a x d with b x c; the fraction on the side of the larger product is greater (assuming positive denominators).
What is the percentage equivalent of the fraction 1/8?
1/8 = 12.5%.
What is the percentage equivalent of the fraction 1/6?
1/6 = 16.67% (approximately 16 and 2/3 percent).
What is the percentage equivalent of the fraction 1/3 and 2/3?
1/3 = 33.33% and 2/3 = 66.67% (approximately).
What is the percentage equivalent of the fraction 3/8?
3/8 = 37.5%.
What is the percentage equivalent of the fraction 5/6?
5/6 = 83.33% (approximately 83 and 1/3 percent).
Why is memorizing fraction-to-percentage conversions useful in DI?
Many DI percentages correspond to simple fractions; recognizing them (e.g., 12.5% = 1/8) lets you multiply by an easy fraction instead of doing long percentage calculations.
What is the basic structure of a Data Sufficiency question?
A Data Sufficiency question gives a question stem followed by two statements (I and II); you must determine whether the statements, individually or together, provide enough information to answer, without necessarily computing the final answer.
What is the standard five-option answer framework for Data Sufficiency questions?
(A) Statement I alone is sufficient but II alone is not; (B) Statement II alone is sufficient but I alone is not; (C) Both together are sufficient but neither alone is; (D) Each alone is sufficient; (E) Both together are still not sufficient.
In Data Sufficiency, why should you evaluate each statement independently before combining them?
Because the answer depends on individual sufficiency first; combining statements is only considered when neither alone is sufficient, and judging them together prematurely causes wrong answers.
In Quant-Based Data Sufficiency, what makes a statement 'sufficient'?
A statement is sufficient if it yields a single, unique, definite value or a definite yes/no answer to the question; if more than one possible answer remains, it is insufficient.
In Quant Data Sufficiency, why must you avoid actually solving for the final numeric value?
You only need to confirm a unique answer is determinable; fully solving wastes time, and the task is to judge sufficiency, not to produce the number.
In Reasoning-Based Data Sufficiency, how is sufficiency judged?
A statement (or combination) is sufficient if it logically pins down the required arrangement, relationship, or conclusion uniquely; if multiple valid configurations remain, it is insufficient.
In Data Sufficiency, what common trap involves a statement that merely restates the question or gives no new constraint?
A statement that repeats given information or adds no genuine constraint is insufficient; recognizing redundant data prevents wrongly marking it sufficient.
What this deck covers
The Data Interpretation and Data Sufficiency deck follows the SNAP Data Interpretation and Data Sufficiency syllabus — 4 chapters and 14 topics — so questions land on material that is genuinely examinable rather than trivia around it. That works out to roughly 12.8 cards per chapter.
Answers are written to be recallable, not just readable — averaging about 141 characters, which is long enough to carry the reasoning and short enough to say out loud.
A deck like this earns its keep on the second and third pass. Read the syllabus first so you know the shape of the subject, then use the cards to find the specific facts that have not stuck.
Data Interpretation and Data Sufficiency flashcards FAQ
How many Data Interpretation and Data Sufficiency flashcards are in this SNAP deck?
51 cards. This page previews 24 of them, sampled evenly across the deck so you can judge the difficulty before installing anything.
Are these SNAP flashcards free?
Yes. The preview here is free to read with no signup, and the full 51-card deck is free inside the Examius app.
What do the Data Interpretation and Data Sufficiency cards cover?
They follow the SNAP Data Interpretation and Data Sufficiency syllabus — 4 chapters and 14 topics — so the questions track what is actually examinable.
How should I use these flashcards?
Read the syllabus first so you know the shape of the subject, then drill the deck. Examius schedules each card with spaced repetition, so cards you keep missing come back sooner and ones you know drift further apart.