🇺🇸 Patent Bar Examination (USPTO Registration Exam) · flashcards

Patent Bar Examination (USPTO Registration Exam) Post-Issuance Proceedings and PTAB Practice Flashcards

51 question-and-answer cards covering Post-Issuance Proceedings and PTAB Practice as it is examined in Patent Bar Examination (USPTO Registration Exam). 24 of them are printed below, taken from across the deck — no signup, no paywall on the preview.

51Cards in deck
24Free preview
16Syllabus topics
~166Chars per answer
FreePrice

24 sample cards from the Post-Issuance Proceedings and PTAB Practice deck

Sampled from the end of the deck, so these are different cards from the ones shown on the syllabus page.

  1. When do amended or new reissue claims trigger intervening rights?

    Intervening rights arise for claims that are substantively changed (not identical in scope) by the reissue; claims that are unchanged in scope are treated as continuously in effect and do not trigger intervening rights.

  2. What is ex parte reexamination and who may request it?

    A proceeding (35 U.S.C. 302) in which the USPTO re-examines an issued patent's claims over patents and printed publications; anyone, including the patent owner or a third party (or even the Director), may request it.

  3. What threshold must be met to grant an ex parte reexamination request?

    The request must raise a substantial new question of patentability (SNQ) affecting at least one claim of the patent.

  4. What types of prior art may be used in ex parte reexamination?

    Only prior art consisting of patents and printed publications (i.e., grounds under 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103); issues like public use, on-sale, or 112 cannot form the basis.

  5. After an ex parte reexamination is ordered, what is the third-party requester's level of participation?

    Very limited; a third-party requester may file one reply to the patent owner's first statement (if any), but otherwise the proceeding is conducted ex parte between the patent owner and the examiner.

  6. How does an ex parte reexamination conclude?

    With issuance of a reexamination certificate that cancels unpatentable claims, confirms patentable claims, and incorporates any amended or new claims found patentable.

  7. Can claims be broadened during ex parte reexamination?

    No. The patent owner may amend or add claims but may not enlarge the scope of the claims in a reexamination proceeding.

  8. What is supplemental examination under 35 U.S.C. 257, and who may request it?

    A proceeding allowing the patent owner (only the patent owner) to ask the USPTO to consider, reconsider, or correct information believed relevant to the patent.

  9. What is the key strategic benefit of supplemental examination?

    Information properly considered in supplemental examination cannot later be used to hold the patent unenforceable for inequitable conduct (it can 'cure' potential inequitable conduct), subject to exceptions.

  10. What kinds of information can be raised in supplemental examination, and how does that differ from reexamination?

    Any information believed relevant (not limited to patents/printed publications—can include 101, 112, public use, etc.), unlike reexamination which is limited to patents and printed publications.

  11. What happens after a supplemental examination if a substantial new question of patentability is found?

    The Director orders an ex parte reexamination of the patent to address the SNQ raised by the information.

  12. What is inter partes review (IPR)?

    An AIA trial proceeding before the PTAB (35 U.S.C. 311) in which a third party challenges the validity of issued patent claims, limited to 102/103 grounds based on patents and printed publications.

  13. What is the timing for filing an IPR petition?

    An IPR may be filed only after the later of: 9 months from the patent's grant (or reissue), or the termination of any post-grant review of that patent.

  14. What is the institution threshold for IPR?

    There must be a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail with respect to at least one challenged claim.

  15. What is the one-year statutory bar for IPR petitioners?

    A petitioner may not file an IPR more than one year after being served with a complaint alleging infringement of the patent.

  16. What is post-grant review (PGR)?

    An AIA trial proceeding before the PTAB (35 U.S.C. 321) allowing a third party to challenge an issued patent on essentially any ground of invalidity, available only for first-inventor-to-file (AIA) patents.

  17. What is the filing window for a PGR petition?

    A PGR petition must be filed within 9 months after the grant (or reissue) of the patent.

  18. On what grounds may a patent be challenged in PGR, compared to IPR?

    PGR allows any invalidity ground (e.g., 101, 112, 102, 103, plus prior public use/on-sale)—except best mode; IPR is limited to 102/103 based only on patents and printed publications.

  19. What is the institution threshold for PGR?

    It is more likely than not that at least one challenged claim is unpatentable, OR the petition raises a novel or unsettled legal question important to other patents/applications.

  20. What estoppel results from a final written decision in IPR or PGR?

    The petitioner is estopped from later asserting in the USPTO, district court, or ITC any ground that was raised or reasonably could have been raised during the proceeding.

  21. What is a derivation proceeding under 35 U.S.C. 135?

    An AIA PTAB proceeding (replacing interference for first-inventor-to-file patents) to determine whether an earlier-filing applicant derived the claimed invention from the petitioner and filed without authorization.

  22. What is the deadline to file a petition for a derivation proceeding?

    The petition must be filed within one year of the first publication of a claim to an invention that is the same or substantially the same as the earlier application's claim.

  23. When may an applicant appeal to the PTAB during examination under 35 U.S.C. 134?

    An applicant may appeal to the PTAB after any claim has been twice rejected (i.e., after a final rejection), to challenge the examiner's rejection.

  24. What are the applicant's options after receiving an adverse PTAB decision in an ex parte appeal?

    The applicant may appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) under 35 U.S.C. 141, or file a civil action in district court under 35 U.S.C. 145.

What this deck covers

The Post-Issuance Proceedings and PTAB Practice deck follows the Patent Bar Examination (USPTO Registration Exam) Post-Issuance Proceedings and PTAB Practice syllabus — 4 chapters and 16 topics — so questions land on material that is genuinely examinable rather than trivia around it. That works out to roughly 12.8 cards per chapter.

Answers are written to be recallable, not just readable — averaging about 166 characters, which is long enough to carry the reasoning and short enough to say out loud.

A deck like this earns its keep on the second and third pass. Read the syllabus first so you know the shape of the subject, then use the cards to find the specific facts that have not stuck.

Post-Issuance Proceedings and PTAB Practice flashcards FAQ

How many Post-Issuance Proceedings and PTAB Practice flashcards are in this Patent Bar Examination (USPTO Registration Exam) deck?

51 cards. This page previews 24 of them, sampled evenly across the deck so you can judge the difficulty before installing anything.

Are these Patent Bar Examination (USPTO Registration Exam) flashcards free?

Yes. The preview here is free to read with no signup, and the full 51-card deck is free inside the Examius app.

What do the Post-Issuance Proceedings and PTAB Practice cards cover?

They follow the Patent Bar Examination (USPTO Registration Exam) Post-Issuance Proceedings and PTAB Practice syllabus — 4 chapters and 16 topics — so the questions track what is actually examinable.

How should I use these flashcards?

Read the syllabus first so you know the shape of the subject, then drill the deck. Examius schedules each card with spaced repetition, so cards you keep missing come back sooner and ones you know drift further apart.