🇮🇳 MAT · flashcards
MAT Intelligence and Critical Reasoning Flashcards
50 question-and-answer cards covering Intelligence and Critical Reasoning as it is examined in MAT. 24 of them are printed below, taken from across the deck — no signup, no paywall on the preview.
24 sample cards from the Intelligence and Critical Reasoning deck
Sampled from the end of the deck, so these are different cards from the ones shown on the syllabus page.
What is the difference between an inference and an assumption in critical reasoning?
An assumption comes before/underlies the statement (a precondition taken for granted); an inference comes after (a conclusion drawn from the statement). Assumption = unstated premise; inference = unstated result.
In 'Course of Action' problems, what makes a suggested action a valid course of action?
A valid course of action must directly address the problem in the statement, be practical/feasible, and lead to improvement or solve/reduce the problem—not be extreme, impractical, or irrelevant.
In Course of Action questions, why are extreme actions like 'ban it completely' or 'punish everyone' usually rejected?
Because valid courses of action should be practical, proportionate and constructive; extreme, absolute, or punitive solutions are typically deemed impractical or unreasonable and do not 'follow'.
What is 'logical consistency' in critical reasoning, and what makes a set of statements inconsistent?
Logical consistency means a set of statements can all be true at the same time. Statements are inconsistent (contradictory) if accepting all of them forces a contradiction—no scenario satisfies them simultaneously.
What does it mean for an argument to be 'valid' versus 'sound' in logic?
An argument is valid if the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises (form is correct). It is sound if it is valid AND all its premises are actually true. Validity is about structure; soundness adds truth.
In syllogisms, what are the four standard categorical statement types (A, E, I, O)?
A = universal affirmative ('All S are P'); E = universal negative ('No S is P'); I = particular affirmative ('Some S are P'); O = particular negative ('Some S are not P').
What is the 'immediate inference' from 'Some A are B' regarding the converse?
'Some A are B' implies 'Some B are A' (conversion of an I statement is valid). However it does NOT guarantee 'Some A are not B' or 'All A are B'.
In syllogisms, what conclusion follows from 'All A are B' and 'All B are C'?
'All A are C' definitely follows (and therefore 'Some A are C' and 'Some C are A'). 'All C are A' does NOT follow.
In syllogisms, what is the rule about drawing a conclusion from two particular premises (two 'Some' statements)?
No definite conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises; at least one premise must be universal for a valid categorical conclusion to follow.
In syllogisms, what is the rule about drawing a conclusion from two negative premises?
No valid conclusion follows from two negative premises ('No' / 'Some...not'). At least one premise must be affirmative to reach a definite conclusion.
In syllogisms, what is the 'either-or' (complementary pair) case and when does it apply?
When neither of two conclusions individually follows but together they exhaust all possibilities (they form a complementary I–O pair on the same terms, e.g., 'Some A are B' and 'Some A are not B'), then 'either conclusion I or II follows'.
In syllogisms, what does 'Some A are B' allow regarding the possibility 'All A are B' and 'All B are A'?
From 'Some A are B', the possibility cases 'All A are B' and 'All B are A' may both be possibly true (they don't contradict 'Some'), though neither definitely follows.
What is the difference between an analogy and a classification (odd-one-out) question?
An analogy gives a related pair and asks you to complete a second pair using the same relationship (A:B :: C:?); classification gives a group and asks you to find the item that does NOT share the common property.
In analogy problems, what are common relationship types to look for?
Synonym/antonym, part-to-whole, cause-effect, worker-tool, object-function, category-example, degree/intensity, and symbolic (number/letter pattern) relationships.
In a number-analogy like 4:64 :: 5:?, how do you find the answer?
Identify the operation linking the pair: 4³ = 64, so the rule is 'cube'. Apply it: 5³ = 125. So 4:64 :: 5:125.
What is the basic approach to solving an Input-Output (machine arrangement) problem?
Find the rule the machine applies in each step (sorting, shifting, arithmetic, or rearranging words/numbers by some criterion), confirm it across all given steps, then apply it forward or backward to reach the asked step.
In Input-Output problems, why can you usually NOT reverse-engineer the original input from a later step?
Because the rearrangement rules (e.g., 'shift the largest number to the front') are typically not reversible—information about original order is lost—so questions normally ask for forward steps, not the original input.
What general strategy helps solve puzzle problems with multiple variables (e.g., people, days, items)?
Make a grid/table linking each variable, fill in definite (direct) clues first, use elimination for negative clues, then apply conditional clues; track all possibilities until only one consistent solution remains.
In a 'blood relations within a puzzle' or coded-relation problem, what does the symbol approach involve?
Translate each relationship symbol (e.g., '+' = father, '−' = sister) into a small family chart, build the chain person by person, then read off the asked relationship—watching gender carefully.
What is the difference between verbal and non-verbal (visual) reasoning?
Verbal reasoning uses words, statements and language-based logic; non-verbal reasoning uses figures, patterns, shapes and images—testing visual pattern recognition rather than language.
In non-verbal series problems, what transformations should you check between successive figures?
Rotation (clockwise/anticlockwise by a fixed angle), reflection/mirroring, addition or removal of elements, change in shading, movement of an element along a path, and increase/decrease in number of components.
In paper folding and punching (non-verbal) problems, how is the final unfolded pattern determined?
Each punched hole reappears symmetrically across every fold line when unfolded; so a single punch on a paper folded k times produces 2^k holes arranged symmetrically about the fold axes.
In mirror-image vs water-image (non-verbal) problems, what is the difference?
A mirror image reflects left↔right (vertical axis), reversing horizontal orientation; a water image reflects top↔bottom (horizontal axis), inverting the figure vertically. Each is the reflection about the respective axis.
In figure-counting non-verbal problems (e.g., 'how many triangles'), what systematic method avoids missing figures?
Count by size/order: first the smallest individual shapes, then shapes made of two parts, three parts, and so on up to the whole figure, summing all counts—labelling regions to track combinations.
What this deck covers
The Intelligence and Critical Reasoning deck follows the MAT Intelligence and Critical Reasoning syllabus — 3 chapters and 12 topics — so questions land on material that is genuinely examinable rather than trivia around it. That works out to roughly 16.7 cards per chapter.
Answers are written to be recallable, not just readable — averaging about 187 characters, which is long enough to carry the reasoning and short enough to say out loud.
A deck like this earns its keep on the second and third pass. Read the syllabus first so you know the shape of the subject, then use the cards to find the specific facts that have not stuck.
Intelligence and Critical Reasoning flashcards FAQ
How many Intelligence and Critical Reasoning flashcards are in this MAT deck?
50 cards. This page previews 24 of them, sampled evenly across the deck so you can judge the difficulty before installing anything.
Are these MAT flashcards free?
Yes. The preview here is free to read with no signup, and the full 50-card deck is free inside the Examius app.
What do the Intelligence and Critical Reasoning cards cover?
They follow the MAT Intelligence and Critical Reasoning syllabus — 3 chapters and 12 topics — so the questions track what is actually examinable.
How should I use these flashcards?
Read the syllabus first so you know the shape of the subject, then drill the deck. Examius schedules each card with spaced repetition, so cards you keep missing come back sooner and ones you know drift further apart.