Law National Aptitude Test (LNAT) Reading Comprehension (Section A) Flashcards

24 sample cards from the Reading Comprehension (Section A) deck

Sampled from the end of the deck, so these are different cards from the ones shown on the syllabus page.

1. How should you read an argumentative passage differently from an informative one?

   In an argumentative passage, actively identify the thesis, the supporting reasons, the assumptions, the evidence and any counter-arguments — and remain alert to rhetorical and persuasive techniques rather than treating claims as neutral facts.

2. What characterises an 'expository' or 'informative' passage?

   A text that explains, describes or informs — presenting facts, processes or concepts in a relatively neutral, objective way without aiming primarily to persuade.

3. What characterises 'literary, narrative or reflective' prose?

   Writing that tells a story or explores experience and feeling — using description, voice, imagery and tone — where meaning is often conveyed implicitly through style and mood rather than explicit argument.

4. When reading reflective/narrative prose, what should you pay special attention to?

   Tone, voice, imagery, mood and implied meaning, since the author's point is often conveyed through how something is expressed rather than through stated claims.

5. What subject ranges should an LNAT candidate be prepared to read about?

   A broad spread including ethics, science, politics, philosophy and the arts — no specialist prior knowledge is required, only comprehension and reasoning skills.

6. Does the LNAT require prior subject knowledge of the passage's topic?

   No — every passage is self-contained; you must reason only from the information given, never from outside expertise, because the test measures comprehension and critical reasoning, not knowledge.

7. What is a strategy for decoding a long, complex sentence?

   Identify the main clause (core subject and verb) first, then mentally set aside subordinate clauses, qualifiers and parenthetical material to grasp the core proposition before adding the detail back.

8. In a complex sentence, what is the function of a subordinate (dependent) clause?

   It adds supporting detail, condition, cause, contrast or qualification to the main clause but cannot stand alone as a complete sentence; the main clause carries the central assertion.

9. How should you handle a passage on unfamiliar subject matter?

   Rely on the text alone: focus on structure and logic, infer technical terms from context, and answer using only what the passage states rather than trying to supply missing background knowledge.

10. How can you cope with abstract or theoretical content in a passage?

    Anchor abstractions to the examples and explanations the author provides, paraphrase difficult ideas in your own simpler words, and track the logical relationships between concepts rather than memorising the jargon.

11. What does it mean to not let personal opinion 'distort' comprehension?

    Reading and answering based on what the author actually argues, not on whether you agree with it — separating the author's position from your own beliefs so your views do not bias your interpretation.

12. Why is separating your own view from the author's view critical in the LNAT?

    Questions ask what the passage says or implies, not what is true or what you think; importing personal opinion leads to choosing answers the text does not support.

13. What is a 'main idea' question testing, and what is the common trap answer?

    It tests whether you grasp the central point of the whole passage; the common trap is an option that is true and mentioned in the text but is only a supporting detail, not the overall point.

14. What is the difference between a passage's 'tone' and its 'content'?

    Content is what the passage says (its information and claims); tone is the author's attitude or emotional colouring toward the subject, conveyed through word choice and style (e.g. critical, ironic, sympathetic, detached).

15. Define 'rhetorical question' and its function in persuasive writing.

    A question asked for effect rather than to elicit an answer, used to lead the reader toward a particular conclusion or to emphasise a point the author treats as obvious.

16. What is an 'assumption' underlying an argument?

    An unstated premise the argument takes for granted and depends on; if the assumption is false, the argument's reasoning breaks down even if its stated evidence is accurate.

17. How do you identify the conclusion of an argument within a passage?

    Find the claim the author is trying to get you to accept — often introduced by markers like 'therefore', 'so' or 'it follows that', and supported by the other statements (the premises).

18. What is the difference between a fact and an opinion in a passage?

    A fact is a verifiable statement that can be shown true or false; an opinion is a subjective judgement, evaluation or belief that reflects the author's viewpoint and cannot be objectively verified.

19. Why is it useful to distinguish premises from conclusions when reading an argument?

    Premises are the supporting reasons and the conclusion is the claim they support; separating them lets you assess whether the reasoning is valid and whether the evidence actually backs the claim.

20. What should you do when two answer options both seem plausible in a comprehension question?

    Return to the passage and pick the option most directly and fully supported by the text; eliminate the one that overstates, adds unsupported detail, or relies on outside assumption.

21. What are common 'trap' wrong-answer types in LNAT comprehension questions?

    Options that are too extreme/absolute, that distort the passage, that are true in reality but not stated in the text, that address the wrong detail, or that reverse the author's intended meaning.

22. How does an author's word choice (diction) reveal purpose and stance?

    Emotive, loaded or evaluative diction signals persuasion and bias, while neutral, precise diction signals an informative or objective purpose; tracking diction helps classify the passage and detect the author's attitude.

23. What reading approach suits passages combining argument with abstract philosophy or ethics?

    Identify the central claim and follow the chain of reasoning step by step, ground each abstract term in the author's own definitions or examples, and judge conclusions only on the logic presented, setting aside personal moral views.

24. What is the overarching skill the LNAT Section A reading comprehension assesses?

    The ability to understand, interpret, analyse and draw logical conclusions from written argument — accurately identifying meaning, inference, purpose and reasoning — independent of prior subject knowledge or personal opinion.

What this deck covers

Reading Comprehension (Section A) flashcards FAQ