🇺🇸 Financial Risk Manager (FRM) · flashcards
Financial Risk Manager (FRM) Quantitative Analysis Flashcards
51 question-and-answer cards covering Quantitative Analysis as it is examined in Financial Risk Manager (FRM). 24 of them are printed below, taken from across the deck — no signup, no paywall on the preview.
24 sample cards from the Quantitative Analysis deck
Sampled from the end of the deck, so these are different cards from the ones shown on the syllabus page.
Outline the steps of the hypothesis testing framework.
State the null $H_0$ and alternative $H_1$; choose a significance level $\alpha$; compute a test statistic; determine the critical value(s) / rejection region or the p-value; reject $H_0$ if the statistic falls in the rejection region (or $p < \alpha$), otherwise fail to reject.
Distinguish Type I and Type II errors and define the power of a test.
Type I error: rejecting a true $H_0$, with probability $\alpha$ (the significance level). Type II error: failing to reject a false $H_0$, with probability $\beta$. Power $= 1 - \beta$, the probability of correctly rejecting a false null.
What is a p-value, and how is it used in a decision rule?
The p-value is the probability of obtaining a test statistic at least as extreme as the observed one, assuming $H_0$ is true. Reject $H_0$ if the p-value $< \alpha$; a smaller p-value indicates stronger evidence against the null.
Contrast a one-tailed and a two-tailed hypothesis test.
A two-tailed test ($H_1: \theta \neq \theta_0$) splits $\alpha$ between both tails and detects deviations in either direction. A one-tailed test ($H_1: \theta > \theta_0$ or $\theta < \theta_0$) places all of $\alpha$ in one tail and detects deviation in only the specified direction.
Describe maximum likelihood estimation (MLE).
MLE chooses parameter values that maximize the likelihood function $L(\theta) = \prod_i f(x_i; \theta)$ (or equivalently the log-likelihood $\ell(\theta) = \sum_i \ln f(x_i; \theta)$). The MLE is the parameter set that makes the observed data most probable; it is consistent and asymptotically efficient and normal.
Describe the method of moments estimation procedure.
The method of moments equates population (theoretical) moments to their corresponding sample moments and solves for the parameters. For example, set the population mean equal to the sample mean and the population variance equal to the sample variance, then solve.
Write the population simple linear regression model and identify each term.
$$Y_i = \beta_0 + \beta_1 X_i + \varepsilon_i,$$ where $\beta_0$ is the intercept, $\beta_1$ is the slope, $X_i$ is the regressor, $\varepsilon_i$ is the error term, and $Y_i$ is the dependent variable.
Give the OLS estimator of the slope $\hat{\beta}_1$ in simple regression.
$$\hat{\beta}_1 = \frac{\operatorname{Cov}(X, Y)}{\operatorname{Var}(X)} = \frac{\sum_{i}(X_i - \bar{X})(Y_i - \bar{Y})}{\sum_{i}(X_i - \bar{X})^{2}}.$$ The intercept is $\hat{\beta}_0 = \bar{Y} - \hat{\beta}_1 \bar{X}$.
What does OLS minimize, and what is the residual?
OLS minimizes the sum of squared residuals $\sum_i \hat{\varepsilon}_i^{2} = \sum_i (Y_i - \hat{Y}_i)^{2}$. The residual is $\hat{\varepsilon}_i = Y_i - \hat{Y}_i$, the difference between the observed and the fitted value.
Define $R^{2}$ and explain what it measures.
$R^{2} = \dfrac{\text{ESS}}{\text{TSS}} = 1 - \dfrac{\text{SSR}}{\text{TSS}}$, the fraction of total variation in $Y$ explained by the regression. It ranges from $0$ to $1$; higher values indicate a better in-sample fit.
Write the multiple regression model and explain how slope coefficients are interpreted.
$$Y_i = \beta_0 + \beta_1 X_{1i} + \beta_2 X_{2i} + \cdots + \beta_k X_{ki} + \varepsilon_i.$$ Each $\beta_j$ is the expected change in $Y$ for a one-unit increase in $X_j$, holding all other regressors constant (the partial/ceteris paribus effect).
List the key OLS (Gauss-Markov) assumptions for the classical linear regression model.
Linearity in parameters; the error has zero conditional mean $E[\varepsilon \mid X] = 0$; homoskedasticity (constant error variance); no autocorrelation of errors; no perfect multicollinearity among regressors. Under these, OLS is BLUE. Normality of errors is added for exact inference.
Why is adjusted $R^{2}$ preferred over $R^{2}$ in multiple regression?
$R^{2}$ never decreases when regressors are added, even useless ones. Adjusted $R^{2} = 1 - \dfrac{(1 - R^{2})(n - 1)}{n - k - 1}$ penalizes for the number of regressors $k$, so it can fall when an added variable does not improve fit enough to justify the lost degree of freedom.
Define multicollinearity and describe its consequences in OLS.
Multicollinearity is a high correlation among regressors. Perfect multicollinearity makes OLS estimates non-identifiable. Imperfect multicollinearity inflates coefficient standard errors, making individual coefficients statistically insignificant and unstable even when the overall regression fits well.
Define heteroskedasticity and explain its effect on OLS inference.
Heteroskedasticity is non-constant error variance, $\operatorname{Var}(\varepsilon_i \mid X) \neq \text{constant}$. OLS coefficients remain unbiased and consistent but are no longer efficient, and the usual standard errors are biased, invalidating t- and F-tests. Remedy: use robust (White) standard errors.
Explain omitted variable bias and the two conditions required for it.
Omitting a relevant variable biases the included coefficients if the omitted variable is both (1) a determinant of $Y$ and (2) correlated with an included regressor. This violates $E[\varepsilon \mid X] = 0$, making OLS biased and inconsistent.
How do you test the significance of a single regression coefficient?
Use a t-test: $t = \dfrac{\hat{\beta}_j - \beta_{j,0}}{\text{SE}(\hat{\beta}_j)}$, typically with $\beta_{j,0} = 0$. Compare $|t|$ to the critical value with $n - k - 1$ degrees of freedom (or check the p-value); reject if it exceeds the critical value.
What does the F-test assess in a multiple regression, and what is its null hypothesis?
The F-test assesses the joint significance of a group of (or all) slope coefficients. For overall significance the null is $H_0: \beta_1 = \beta_2 = \cdots = \beta_k = 0$. A large F-statistic relative to its critical value rejects the null that the regressors jointly have no explanatory power.
Define a stationary (covariance-stationary) time series.
A series is covariance-stationary if its mean, variance, and autocovariances are constant over time and the autocovariance depends only on the lag $h$, not on time $t$: $E[Y_t] = \mu$, $\operatorname{Var}(Y_t) = \sigma^{2}$, and $\operatorname{Cov}(Y_t, Y_{t-h}) = \gamma_h$.
Define white noise and autocorrelation.
White noise is a series of uncorrelated random variables with constant mean (usually zero) and constant variance, with no autocorrelation at any nonzero lag. Autocorrelation is the correlation of a series with its own lagged values: $\rho_h = \dfrac{\operatorname{Cov}(Y_t, Y_{t-h})}{\operatorname{Var}(Y_t)}$.
Write the AR(1) model and state its stationarity condition.
$$Y_t = c + \phi Y_{t-1} + \varepsilon_t,$$ where $\varepsilon_t$ is white noise. It is covariance-stationary if $|\phi| < 1$. Its unconditional mean is $\dfrac{c}{1 - \phi}$, and the autocorrelation function decays geometrically as $\phi^{h}$.
Write an MA(1) model and contrast MA and AR processes.
$$Y_t = \mu + \varepsilon_t + \theta\,\varepsilon_{t-1}.$$ An MA process expresses $Y_t$ as a finite linear combination of current and past white-noise shocks and always has finite memory (autocorrelations cut off after lag $q$). An AR process depends on past values of $Y$ and has infinite, geometrically decaying memory. An ARMA(p,q) combines both.
Compare the EWMA and GARCH(1,1) approaches to volatility estimation.
EWMA: $\sigma_t^{2} = \lambda\sigma_{t-1}^{2} + (1 - \lambda)r_{t-1}^{2}$, weighting recent returns more (no long-run mean). GARCH(1,1): $\sigma_t^{2} = \omega + \alpha r_{t-1}^{2} + \beta\sigma_{t-1}^{2}$, which adds a constant $\omega$ and mean-reverts to a long-run variance $\dfrac{\omega}{1 - \alpha - \beta}$ when $\alpha + \beta < 1$. EWMA is the special case with $\omega = 0$, $\alpha = 1-\lambda$, $\beta = \lambda$.
Define the Pearson correlation coefficient and contrast it with a copula's role in dependence modeling.
Pearson correlation $\rho_{X,Y} = \dfrac{\operatorname{Cov}(X, Y)}{\sigma_X \sigma_Y}$ measures only linear dependence and lies in $[-1, 1]$. A copula links marginal distributions into a joint distribution, capturing the full dependence structure (including nonlinear and tail dependence) separately from the marginals, per Sklar's theorem. This is important because correlation alone can miss joint extreme (tail) events.
What this deck covers
The Quantitative Analysis deck follows the Financial Risk Manager (FRM) Quantitative Analysis syllabus — 6 chapters and 21 topics — so questions land on material that is genuinely examinable rather than trivia around it. That works out to roughly 8.5 cards per chapter.
Answers are written to be recallable, not just readable — averaging about 280 characters, which is long enough to carry the reasoning and short enough to say out loud.
A deck like this earns its keep on the second and third pass. Read the syllabus first so you know the shape of the subject, then use the cards to find the specific facts that have not stuck.
Quantitative Analysis flashcards FAQ
How many Quantitative Analysis flashcards are in this Financial Risk Manager (FRM) deck?
51 cards. This page previews 24 of them, sampled evenly across the deck so you can judge the difficulty before installing anything.
Are these Financial Risk Manager (FRM) flashcards free?
Yes. The preview here is free to read with no signup, and the full 51-card deck is free inside the Examius app.
What do the Quantitative Analysis cards cover?
They follow the Financial Risk Manager (FRM) Quantitative Analysis syllabus — 6 chapters and 21 topics — so the questions track what is actually examinable.
How should I use these flashcards?
Read the syllabus first so you know the shape of the subject, then drill the deck. Examius schedules each card with spaced repetition, so cards you keep missing come back sooner and ones you know drift further apart.