🌍 Statistics & Probability · subject
Statistics & Probability Regression & Correlation Syllabus
Every chapter and topic of Regression & Correlation examined in Statistics & Probability — 5 chapters, 19 topics, plus 50 flashcards written against it.
Regression & Correlation syllabus — full chapter and topic list
Expand any chapter to see its topics and sub-topics. This is the whole examinable outline for Regression & Correlation in Statistics & Probability, not a summary of it.
-
Correlation Analysis
4 topics- Pearson Correlation Coefficient
- Coefficient of Determination
- Correlation vs Causation
- Rank Correlation
-
Simple Linear Regression
4 topics- Least Squares Method
- Interpreting Slope and Intercept
- Residuals and Goodness of Fit
- Inference on Regression Coefficients
-
Multiple Linear Regression
4 topics- Model Specification
- Multicollinearity
- Model Selection
- Interaction and Polynomial Terms
-
Regression Diagnostics
4 topics- Linearity and Homoscedasticity
- Normality of Residuals
- Influential Points and Leverage
- Heteroscedasticity Remedies
-
Generalized Linear Models
3 topics- Logistic Regression
- Poisson Regression
- Link Functions
Regression & Correlation flashcards for Statistics & Probability
21 of 50 cards from the Regression & Correlation deck — real questions with worked answers.
Define the Pearson correlation coefficient $r$ and give its formula for a sample.
$r$ measures the strength and direction of the *linear* association between two quantitative variables. $$r = \frac{\sum (x_i - \bar{x})(y_i - \bar{y})}{\sqrt{\sum (x_i - \bar{x})^{2}}\,\sqrt{\sum (y_i - \bar{y})^{2}}} = \frac{S_{xy}}{\sqrt{S_{xx}\,S_{yy}}}$$
What is the range of the Pearson correlation coefficient $r$, and what do the extreme values mean?
$-1 \leq r \leq 1$. Values of $r = +1$ or $r = -1$ indicate a perfect positive or negative linear relationship (all points lie exactly on a line); $r = 0$ indicates no linear relationship.
State three key properties of the Pearson correlation coefficient $r$.
(1) It is dimensionless and unaffected by the units or by linear rescaling of $x$ or $y$. (2) It is symmetric: $r_{xy} = r_{yx}$. (3) It only measures *linear* association, so $r \approx 0$ can still occur with a strong nonlinear relationship.
How is the Pearson correlation $r$ related to the least-squares slope $b$ in simple linear regression?
$$b = r\,\frac{s_y}{s_x}, \qquad r = b\,\frac{s_x}{s_y}$$ where $s_x, s_y$ are the sample standard deviations. Thus $r$ and $b$ always share the same sign.
Define the coefficient of determination $R^{2}$ and interpret it.
$R^{2}$ is the proportion of the total variation in the response $y$ explained by the regression model: $$R^{2} = \frac{SS_{reg}}{SS_{tot}} = 1 - \frac{SS_{res}}{SS_{tot}}$$ It ranges from $0$ to $1$; e.g. $R^{2}=0.8$ means $80\%$ of the variance in $y$ is explained.
In simple linear regression, how does $R^{2}$ relate to the Pearson correlation $r$?
$R^{2} = r^{2}$. Squaring the correlation coefficient gives the coefficient of determination (this identity holds only for simple linear regression with one predictor).
What is adjusted $R^{2}$ and why is it preferred for comparing models with different numbers of predictors?
$$R^{2}_{adj} = 1 - \frac{SS_{res}/(n-p-1)}{SS_{tot}/(n-1)}$$ It penalizes adding predictors that do not improve fit. Unlike $R^{2}$, it can decrease when useless variables are added, making it fairer for model comparison ($n$ = sample size, $p$ = number of predictors).
Explain the principle 'correlation does not imply causation' and name a common cause of spurious correlation.
A statistical association between $X$ and $Y$ does not establish that one causes the other. The link may be reversed, coincidental, or due to a **confounding (lurking) variable** $Z$ that influences both $X$ and $Y$ simultaneously.
What conditions are generally required to infer causation from a statistical relationship?
(1) Association between the variables, (2) proper temporal order (cause precedes effect), and (3) elimination of alternative explanations/confounders — best achieved through a **randomized controlled experiment** rather than observational data.
Define Spearman's rank correlation coefficient $\rho$ and give its computational formula.
Spearman's $\rho$ is Pearson's correlation applied to the ranks of the data. With distinct ranks and differences $d_i$ between paired ranks: $$\rho = 1 - \frac{6\sum d_i^{2}}{n(n^{2}-1)}$$ It measures the strength of a *monotonic* relationship.
When is a rank correlation (Spearman/Kendall) preferred over the Pearson correlation?
When the relationship is monotonic but nonlinear, when the data are ordinal, or when there are outliers/non-normality. Rank methods are nonparametric and robust to outliers and monotonic transformations.
What does Kendall's $\tau$ measure, and how is it defined via concordant and discordant pairs?
Kendall's $\tau$ measures rank agreement using pairs of observations: $$\tau = \frac{(\text{concordant pairs}) - (\text{discordant pairs})}{\binom{n}{2}}$$ A pair is concordant if both members are ordered the same way in $x$ and $y$; $\tau$ ranges from $-1$ to $1$.
State the objective of the least squares method in simple linear regression.
It chooses the slope and intercept that minimize the sum of squared residuals: $$\min_{a,b} \sum_{i=1}^{n} \left(y_i - (a + b x_i)\right)^{2}$$ i.e. minimize the total squared vertical distance from points to the line.
Give the least-squares estimates for the slope $b$ and intercept $a$ in simple linear regression.
$$b = \frac{\sum (x_i - \bar{x})(y_i - \bar{y})}{\sum (x_i - \bar{x})^{2}} = \frac{S_{xy}}{S_{xx}}, \qquad a = \bar{y} - b\,\bar{x}$$ The fitted line always passes through the point $(\bar{x}, \bar{y})$.
What are the normal equations for simple linear regression?
$$\sum y_i = na + b\sum x_i, \qquad \sum x_i y_i = a\sum x_i + b\sum x_i^{2}$$ Solving these two simultaneous equations yields the least-squares estimates $a$ and $b$.
In the model $\hat{y} = a + bx$, how do you interpret the slope $b$?
The slope $b$ is the estimated *change in the mean of $y$ for a one-unit increase in $x$*. Its sign gives the direction of the relationship and its magnitude the rate of change (in units of $y$ per unit of $x$).
In the model $\hat{y} = a + bx$, how do you interpret the intercept $a$, and when is it meaningful?
The intercept $a$ is the predicted mean of $y$ when $x = 0$. It is only meaningful if $x = 0$ is within (or near) the observed range of the data; otherwise it is an extrapolation and may lack practical interpretation.
Define a residual $e_i$ in regression, and state a key property of the least-squares residuals.
A residual is the difference between observed and fitted values: $e_i = y_i - \hat{y}_i$. For least-squares fits with an intercept, the residuals sum to zero, $\sum e_i = 0$, and are uncorrelated with the predictor.
Define the residual standard error (standard error of the estimate) $s_e$.
$$s_e = \sqrt{\frac{\sum (y_i - \hat{y}_i)^{2}}{n - p - 1}} = \sqrt{\frac{SS_{res}}{n-p-1}}$$ It estimates the standard deviation of the residuals (typical prediction error) with $p$ predictors; for simple regression the denominator is $n-2$.
What is the decomposition of the total sum of squares in regression?
$$SS_{tot} = SS_{reg} + SS_{res}$$ $$\sum (y_i - \bar{y})^{2} = \sum (\hat{y}_i - \bar{y})^{2} + \sum (y_i - \hat{y}_i)^{2}$$ Total variation = explained (regression) variation + unexplained (residual) variation.
What is the standard error of the slope estimate $b$ in simple linear regression?
$$SE(b) = \frac{s_e}{\sqrt{\sum (x_i - \bar{x})^{2}}} = \frac{s_e}{\sqrt{S_{xx}}}$$ where $s_e$ is the residual standard error. It shrinks with larger spread in $x$ and larger sample size.
Planning Regression & Correlation for Statistics & Probability
Regression & Correlation is about 12% of the Statistics & Probability syllabus by topic count — 19 of 158 topics, spread over 5 chapters. At roughly 45 minutes per topic plus 12 minutes per sub-topic, a first pass runs to about 15 hours.
The heaviest chapters are Correlation Analysis (4 topics), Simple Linear Regression (4 topics), Multiple Linear Regression (4 topics) . Front-load those while your energy is high; the short chapters are better revision filler later.
Work top-down: read the chapter, then tick topics off individually rather than marking the whole chapter done. Sub-topics are where silent gaps hide.
Regression & Correlation (Statistics & Probability) FAQ
What is in the Statistics & Probability Regression & Correlation syllabus?
Regression & Correlation is split into 5 chapters — Correlation Analysis, Simple Linear Regression, Multiple Linear Regression, Regression Diagnostics and Generalized Linear Models, containing 19 topics and 0 sub-topics in total.
How is Regression & Correlation structured in the Statistics & Probability syllabus?
5 chapters. Regression & Correlation accounts for about 12% of the topics in the whole Statistics & Probability syllabus (19 of 158).
How long should I spend on Regression & Correlation for Statistics & Probability?
Budget around 15 hours for a first pass through Regression & Correlation — about 45 minutes per topic plus 12 minutes per sub-topic across its 19 topics. Add revision cycles on top.
Are there flashcards for Statistics & Probability Regression & Correlation?
Yes — a 50-card Regression & Correlation deck. Sample cards are printed on this page, and the full deck is free in the Examius app with spaced repetition scheduling.