🇺🇸 Associate of the Society of Actuaries (ASA/FSA) · subject
Associate of the Society of Actuaries (ASA/FSA) Exam FAM — Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics Syllabus
Every chapter and topic of Exam FAM — Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics examined in Associate of the Society of Actuaries (ASA/FSA) — 5 chapters, 15 topics and 36 sub-topics, plus 50 flashcards written against it.
Exam FAM — Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics syllabus — full chapter and topic list
Expand any chapter to see its topics and sub-topics. This is the whole examinable outline for Exam FAM — Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics in Associate of the Society of Actuaries (ASA/FSA), not a summary of it.
-
Severity, Frequency, and Aggregate Models
3 topics- Loss Severity Distributions
- Parametric severity models
- Tail weight and moments
- Creating new distributions (mixtures, splicing)
- Frequency Distributions
- (a, b, 0) and (a, b, 1) classes
- Poisson, binomial, negative binomial
- Aggregate Loss Models
- Collective risk model
- Compound distribution moments
- Recursive and convolution methods
- Loss Severity Distributions
-
Coverage Modifications and Pricing
3 topics- Policy Adjustments
- Deductibles (ordinary and franchise)
- Policy limits and coinsurance
- Loss elimination ratio
- Per-Loss vs. Per-Payment Variables
- Expected costs with modifications
- Effect of inflation on modified coverage
- Risk Measures
- Value at Risk (VaR)
- Tail Value at Risk (TVaR)
- Policy Adjustments
-
Parametric Estimation and Credibility
3 topics- Maximum Likelihood Estimation
- Complete and censored/truncated data
- Variance of MLE estimators
- Model Selection
- Goodness-of-fit tests
- Information criteria
- Credibility Theory
- Limited fluctuation (classical) credibility
- Buhlmann and Buhlmann-Straub credibility
- Bayesian credibility
- Maximum Likelihood Estimation
-
Survival Models and Life Contingencies
3 topics- Survival Distributions
- Survival function and force of mortality
- Life tables and fractional-age assumptions
- Select and ultimate mortality
- Life Insurance Present Values
- Whole life, term, and endowment insurances
- Actuarial present value and variance
- Life Annuities
- Whole life and temporary annuities
- Recursion relationships with insurances
- Survival Distributions
-
Premiums and Reserves
3 topics- Net Premium Calculation
- Equivalence principle
- Fully discrete and fully continuous premiums
- Gross (Expense-Loaded) Premiums
- Expense assumptions
- Profit considerations
- Policy Reserves
- Net premium reserves (prospective and retrospective)
- Recursive reserve calculations
- Reserves at fractional durations
- Net Premium Calculation
Exam FAM — Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics flashcards for Associate of the Society of Actuaries (ASA/FSA)
22 of 50 cards from the Exam FAM — Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics deck — real questions with worked answers.
What is the support and key parameter interpretation of the exponential distribution as a loss severity model?
The exponential distribution has support $x \geq 0$ with density $f(x) = \frac{1}{\theta} e^{-x/\theta}$, mean $E[X] = \theta$, and variance $\operatorname{Var}(X) = \theta^{2}$. It is memoryless: $E[X - d \mid X > d] = \theta$ for any deductible $d$.
For a loss random variable $X$, define the $k$-th raw moment and the limited expected value $E[X \wedge u]$.
The $k$-th raw moment is $E[X^{k}] = \int_{0}^{\infty} x^{k} f(x)\, dx$. The limited expected value at limit $u$ is $$E[X \wedge u] = \int_{0}^{u} x f(x)\, dx + u\,[1 - F(u)] = \int_{0}^{u} S(x)\, dx,$$ where $S(x) = 1 - F(x)$ is the survival function.
How do you classify a loss distribution as having a heavy (fat) tail relative to another?
Distribution $X$ has a heavier tail than $Y$ if $\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{S_X(x)}{S_Y(x)} = \infty$, i.e. its survival function decays more slowly. Equivalently, an increasing mean excess (mean residual life) function $e(d) = E[X - d \mid X > d]$ indicates a heavy tail; an increasing hazard rate indicates a light tail.
Define the hazard rate (force of mortality) $h(x)$ and its relationship to the survival function.
The hazard rate is $$h(x) = \frac{f(x)}{S(x)} = -\frac{d}{dx}\ln S(x).$$ Conversely, $S(x) = \exp\!\left(-\int_{0}^{x} h(t)\, dt\right)$. An increasing $h(x)$ implies a lighter tail.
What characterizes the (a, b, 0) class of frequency distributions, and which distributions belong to it?
The $(a,b,0)$ class satisfies the recursion $$\frac{p_k}{p_{k-1}} = a + \frac{b}{k}, \quad k \geq 1.$$ The only members are the Poisson ($a=0$), Binomial ($a<0$), and Negative Binomial ($0<a<1$, including Geometric).
For the Poisson distribution with mean $\lambda$, give the $(a,b,0)$ recursion parameters and the mean–variance relationship.
For Poisson, $a = 0$ and $b = \lambda$, so $p_k = \frac{\lambda}{k} p_{k-1}$. The mean equals the variance: $E[N] = \operatorname{Var}(N) = \lambda$ (equidispersion).
Compare the mean–variance relationship for Poisson, Binomial, and Negative Binomial frequency models.
Poisson: variance $=$ mean (equidispersion). Binomial: variance $<$ mean (underdispersion). Negative Binomial: variance $>$ mean (overdispersion). This dispersion ordering helps select a frequency model from data.
What is the negative binomial distribution's mean and variance in $(r, \beta)$ parameterization?
With parameters $r > 0$ and $\beta > 0$: $E[N] = r\beta$ and $\operatorname{Var}(N) = r\beta(1 + \beta)$. Since $1 + \beta > 1$, variance exceeds the mean (overdispersion).
How is the $(a, b, 1)$ class of frequency distributions defined and when is it used?
The $(a,b,1)$ class satisfies $\frac{p_k}{p_{k-1}} = a + \frac{b}{k}$ for $k \geq 2$ (recursion starts at $k=2$), allowing $p_0$ to be set arbitrarily. It is used for zero-modified or zero-truncated distributions where the probability of zero claims differs from the standard member.
Give the formula for a zero-modified probability $p_k^M$ in terms of the corresponding standard $(a,b,0)$ probabilities.
$$p_k^M = \frac{1 - p_0^M}{1 - p_0}\, p_k, \quad k \geq 1,$$ where $p_0^M$ is the chosen modified probability at zero and $p_0, p_k$ are the original $(a,b,0)$ probabilities. Zero-truncated is the special case $p_0^M = 0$.
Define the collective risk model for aggregate losses $S$ and state its mean.
In the collective risk model $S = X_1 + X_2 + \cdots + X_N$, where $N$ is the claim count (frequency) and $X_i$ are i.i.d. severities independent of $N$. The mean is $E[S] = E[N]\,E[X]$ (a compound expectation).
State the variance of aggregate losses $S$ in the compound (collective risk) model.
$$\operatorname{Var}(S) = E[N]\,\operatorname{Var}(X) + \operatorname{Var}(N)\,(E[X])^{2}.$$ This follows from the law of total variance with $N$ and $X$ independent.
For a compound Poisson aggregate model with Poisson mean $\lambda$, simplify the mean and variance of $S$.
With $N \sim \text{Poisson}(\lambda)$: $E[S] = \lambda\,E[X]$ and $\operatorname{Var}(S) = \lambda\,E[X^{2}]$ (the second raw moment of severity), since $\operatorname{Var}(N) = E[N] = \lambda$.
What is the individual risk model for aggregate losses and how does it differ from the collective risk model?
The individual risk model is $S = \sum_{i=1}^{n} X_i$ over a fixed number $n$ of policies, where each $X_i$ (often $0$ with probability $q_i$) is the loss for policy $i$. Unlike the collective model, $n$ is fixed (not random) and the $X_i$ need not be identically distributed.
How does an ordinary deductible $d$ affect the per-loss payment variable, and give its expected value.
The per-loss variable is $Y^L = (X - d)_+ = \max(X - d, 0)$. Its expected value is $$E[Y^L] = E[X] - E[X \wedge d] = \int_{d}^{\infty} S(x)\, dx.$$ This counts zero payments for losses below the deductible.
Distinguish the per-loss variable $Y^L$ from the per-payment variable $Y^P$ under a deductible $d$.
Per-loss $Y^L = (X-d)_+$ includes losses below $d$ as zero payments. Per-payment $Y^P = (X-d) \mid X > d$ conditions on a payment occurring. They relate by $E[Y^P] = \frac{E[Y^L]}{S(d)} = \frac{E[X] - E[X \wedge d]}{1 - F(d)}$.
How is a policy limit $u$ incorporated, and what is the maximum covered loss with a deductible $d$ and limit $u$?
A policy limit $u$ caps the insurer payment, giving payment $X \wedge u$. With an ordinary deductible $d$ and a limit of $u$ on payments, the maximum covered loss is $u + d$, and the expected payment per loss is $E[X \wedge (u+d)] - E[X \wedge d]$.
Define a coinsurance factor $\alpha$ and write the per-loss payment with deductible $d$, coinsurance $\alpha$, and maximum covered loss $u$.
With coinsurance $\alpha$ (insurer pays fraction $\alpha$), deductible $d$, and maximum covered loss $u$: $$E[Y^L] = \alpha\big(E[X \wedge u] - E[X \wedge d]\big).$$ The order of operations is: apply deductible, then limit, then coinsurance.
What is the loss elimination ratio (LER) for a deductible $d$?
$$\text{LER}(d) = \frac{E[X \wedge d]}{E[X]},$$ the proportion of expected losses eliminated by imposing an ordinary deductible $d$.
How does uniform inflation at rate $r$ affect limited expected values and deductibles?
If losses inflate by factor $(1+r)$, the new loss is $(1+r)X$. The limited expected value scales as $E[(1+r)X \wedge u] = (1+r)\,E\!\left[X \wedge \tfrac{u}{1+r}\right]$. A fixed deductible $d$ is effectively reduced to $\frac{d}{1+r}$ in pre-inflation terms, so expected payments rise faster than $r$.
Define Value at Risk (VaR) at security level $p$ for a loss random variable $X$.
$\text{VaR}_p(X) = \pi_p$ is the $100p$-th percentile of the loss distribution: the smallest value satisfying $F_X(\pi_p) = p$ (i.e. $\pi_p = F_X^{-1}(p)$). It is the loss exceeded with probability $1-p$.
Define Tail Value at Risk (TVaR / CTE) at level $p$ and state how it relates to VaR.
$$\text{TVaR}_p(X) = E[X \mid X > \text{VaR}_p(X)] = \frac{1}{1-p}\int_{p}^{1} \text{VaR}_u(X)\, du.$$ It equals the average of losses exceeding the VaR threshold, so $\text{TVaR}_p \geq \text{VaR}_p$ always.
See more Exam FAM — Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics flashcards →
Planning Exam FAM — Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics for Associate of the Society of Actuaries (ASA/FSA)
Exam FAM — Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics is about 13% of the Associate of the Society of Actuaries (ASA/FSA) syllabus by topic count — 15 of 115 topics, spread over 5 chapters. At roughly 45 minutes per topic plus 12 minutes per sub-topic, a first pass runs to about 20 hours.
The heaviest chapters are Severity, Frequency, and Aggregate Models (3 topics), Coverage Modifications and Pricing (3 topics), Parametric Estimation and Credibility (3 topics) . Front-load those while your energy is high; the short chapters are better revision filler later.
Work top-down: read the chapter, then tick topics off individually rather than marking the whole chapter done. Sub-topics are where silent gaps hide.
Exam FAM — Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics (Associate of the Society of Actuaries (ASA/FSA)) FAQ
What is in the Associate of the Society of Actuaries (ASA/FSA) Exam FAM — Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics syllabus?
Exam FAM — Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics is split into 5 chapters — Severity, Frequency, and Aggregate Models, Coverage Modifications and Pricing, Parametric Estimation and Credibility, Survival Models and Life Contingencies and Premiums and Reserves, containing 15 topics and 36 sub-topics in total.
How is Exam FAM — Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics structured in the Associate of the Society of Actuaries (ASA/FSA) syllabus?
5 chapters. Exam FAM — Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics accounts for about 13% of the topics in the whole Associate of the Society of Actuaries (ASA/FSA) syllabus (15 of 115).
How long should I spend on Exam FAM — Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics for Associate of the Society of Actuaries (ASA/FSA)?
Budget around 20 hours for a first pass through Exam FAM — Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics — about 45 minutes per topic plus 12 minutes per sub-topic across its 15 topics. Add revision cycles on top.
Are there flashcards for Associate of the Society of Actuaries (ASA/FSA) Exam FAM — Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics?
Yes — a 50-card Exam FAM — Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics deck. Sample cards are printed on this page, and the full deck is free in the Examius app with spaced repetition scheduling.