🇬🇧 Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) · subject

Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) Producing the Project Outcome Syllabus

The Producing the Project Outcome syllabus for Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) in full: 4 chapters, 16 topics and 13 sub-topics, every one listed below, plus 51 Producing the Project Outcome flashcards with answers.

4Chapters
16Topics
13Sub-topics
51Flashcards

Producing the Project Outcome syllabus: all 4 chapters

Expand any chapter to see its topics and sub-topics.

  1. Writing the Dissertation

    4 topics
    • Academic report structure
      • Abstract, introduction and aims
      • Literature review, methodology, findings and discussion
      • Conclusion and recommendations
    • Academic writing style
      • Formal, objective and precise language
      • Clarity, cohesion and signposting
    • Meeting the word count requirement (c. 5,000 words)
    • Drafting, redrafting and proofreading
  2. Creating an Artefact or Performance

    4 topics
    • Design and development process
      • Specification, prototyping and iteration
      • Selecting materials, tools or media
    • Planning and delivering a performance
      • Rehearsal, staging and audience considerations
    • The accompanying written report (c. 1,000 words)
      • Justifying choices and documenting the process
    • Evidencing development for non-written outcomes
  3. Referencing and Academic Integrity

    4 topics
    • Why referencing matters
      • Crediting sources and supporting claims
      • Avoiding plagiarism and self-plagiarism
    • Citation systems
      • Harvard, APA, MLA and footnote styles
      • In-text citations versus the bibliography
    • Compiling a bibliography and reference list
    • Understanding malpractice and consequences
  4. Reviewing and Refining the Product

    4 topics
    • Checking the outcome against the original aims
    • Seeking and acting on supervisor feedback
    • Editing for accuracy, coherence and presentation
    • Final formatting and submission preparation

Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) Producing the Project Outcome flashcards — 51 questions with answers

  1. What is the typical word count for an EPQ written report (dissertation-style outcome)?

    Approximately 5,000 words.

  2. What is the typical word count for the accompanying written report when the EPQ outcome is an artefact, performance or other non-written product?

    Approximately 1,000 words.

  3. List the core sections of a standard EPQ academic report in order.

    Title page, abstract/introduction, literature review, methodology, main body/analysis, conclusion, bibliography/reference list, and appendices.

  4. What is the purpose of an abstract or introduction at the start of an EPQ report?

    To state the project's aim/title, set out the research question, and outline the structure and scope of the report.

  5. What goes in the conclusion of an EPQ report?

    A summary of the key findings, a direct answer to the research question, evaluation of how far the aims were met, and acknowledgement of limitations.

  6. Define academic writing style as expected in an EPQ.

    Formal, objective, third-person, precise and evidence-based writing that avoids slang, contractions and unsupported opinion.

  7. Why is the third person generally preferred over the first person in academic writing?

    It creates an objective, impersonal tone that focuses on the evidence and argument rather than the writer's personal feelings.

  8. What is the difference between description and analysis in academic writing?

    Description states what something is or what happened; analysis examines why it matters, interprets evidence, and links it to the argument. Higher marks require analysis.

  9. What is a 'hedging' or cautious-language device in academic writing? Give two examples.

    Tentative phrasing that avoids overstating certainty; examples include 'this suggests', 'it appears that', 'may', 'could', and 'tends to indicate'.

  10. Why must an EPQ argument be 'signposted', and how is it done?

    To guide the reader through the line of reasoning; done with topic sentences, linking words (however, therefore, furthermore) and clear section headings.

  11. What are the three main stages of producing written work, in order?

    Drafting, redrafting, then proofreading.

  12. What is the difference between redrafting and proofreading?

    Redrafting revises content, structure and argument (the substance); proofreading corrects surface errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation and formatting.

  13. Why is leaving time between writing and proofreading recommended?

    Distance from the text helps you read it more objectively and spot errors and weak arguments you would otherwise overlook.

  14. Give three practical proofreading techniques.

    Reading aloud, reading backwards sentence by sentence, printing a hard copy, and not relying solely on spell-check.

  15. What is the main risk of relying only on a spell-checker?

    It misses correctly spelled but wrong words (e.g. 'their/there', 'effect/affect') and cannot judge meaning, grammar context or argument quality.

  16. Name the typical stages of a design and development process for a making/artefact EPQ.

    Research/brief, specification, idea generation, prototyping/development, testing and evaluation, and final refinement.

  17. What is a prototype in the EPQ design process?

    An early, often rough version of the product made to test ideas, identify problems and gather feedback before producing the final outcome.

  18. Why is iteration important in a design and development process?

    Repeated cycles of testing and refinement allow problems to be identified and improvements made, leading to a better final outcome.

  19. For a performance-based EPQ outcome, what are the key planning stages?

    Conceiving the concept, rehearsal scheduling, logistics (venue, equipment, audience), risk assessment, and the delivery of the performance itself.

  20. What must accompany a non-written EPQ outcome such as a performance or artefact?

    An accompanying written report of approximately 1,000 words explaining the process, decisions and evaluation.

Show the other 31 Producing the Project Outcome flashcards
  1. How can a student evidence development for a non-written outcome (e.g. an artefact or event)?

    Through a process log/production diary, photographs or video, draft designs, witness statements, feedback records and the accompanying written report.

  2. What is the purpose of the accompanying written report for a non-written outcome?

    To explain the planning, research and decision-making, evaluate the outcome against the aims, and demonstrate the skills used so the work can be assessed.

  3. Why does referencing matter in academic work? Give three reasons.

    It credits original authors and avoids plagiarism, supports claims with evidence, allows readers to locate sources, and demonstrates the depth of research undertaken.

  4. Define a citation.

    A brief in-text acknowledgement that points to a full source, identifying where an idea, quotation or piece of evidence came from.

  5. What is the difference between an in-text citation and a reference list entry?

    An in-text citation is a short marker within the text; a reference list entry gives the full publication details needed to locate that source.

  6. Name three commonly used citation/referencing systems.

    Harvard (author–date), Vancouver (numeric), and footnote systems such as MLA/Chicago (notes and bibliography). APA is also widely used.

  7. How does an in-text citation appear in the Harvard (author–date) system?

    As the author's surname and year of publication in brackets, e.g. (Smith, 2020), with a page number for direct quotations, e.g. (Smith, 2020, p. 15).

  8. How does the Vancouver (numeric) system handle in-text citations?

    Sources are numbered in the order they first appear, shown as a number in the text (e.g. [1] or superscript), with full details in a numbered reference list.

  9. In a footnote referencing system (e.g. Chicago notes), where do the source details appear?

    In a numbered note at the bottom of the page (or end of the document), corresponding to a superscript number in the text.

  10. What is the difference between a reference list and a bibliography?

    A reference list contains only sources actually cited in the text; a bibliography may also include all background sources consulted even if not directly cited.

  11. In what order is a Harvard reference list arranged?

    Alphabetically by author surname (then by year for multiple works by the same author).

  12. List the typical elements of a Harvard reference for a book.

    Author surname and initial, year of publication, title (italicised), edition (if not first), place of publication, and publisher.

  13. What extra detail must a reference for a website include compared with a book?

    The URL and the date the site was accessed, plus the author/organisation and year where available.

  14. Define plagiarism.

    Presenting someone else's words, ideas or work as your own without proper acknowledgement, whether deliberately or accidentally.

  15. Define malpractice in the context of an EPQ.

    Any deliberate or negligent act that gives an unfair advantage or breaks exam-board rules, including plagiarism, collusion, fabrication of data, and falsifying records.

  16. What is collusion as a form of malpractice?

    Working with others to produce work that is then submitted as a student's own individual work, without authorisation.

  17. Give two possible consequences of proven malpractice in an EPQ.

    Loss of marks or disqualification from the qualification, and being reported to the exam board, which may bar the candidate from other exams.

  18. How can a student avoid unintentional plagiarism?

    By citing every source, using quotation marks for direct quotes, paraphrasing properly in their own words, and keeping accurate notes of where information came from.

  19. What is the difference between quoting and paraphrasing? Must both be cited?

    Quoting reproduces exact words in quotation marks; paraphrasing restates an idea in your own words. Both must be cited to avoid plagiarism.

  20. Why must the finished outcome be checked against the original aims and objectives?

    To evaluate how successfully the project met its intended purpose, evidence critical reflection, and identify what worked and what did not.

  21. What is the difference between an aim and an objective?

    An aim is the broad overall goal of the project; objectives are the specific, measurable steps taken to achieve that aim.

  22. What is the supervisor's role during the production phase of the EPQ?

    To give guidance and feedback, monitor progress and academic integrity, and sign off the production log, without doing the work for the student.

  23. Why is acting on supervisor feedback important, not just receiving it?

    Demonstrating that feedback was used to revise and improve the work evidences reflection and the management skills assessed in the EPQ.

  24. What should a student do when given critical feedback from a supervisor?

    Record it, evaluate which points to act on, make and document the resulting changes, and reflect on the impact in the production log.

  25. What three qualities does the editing stage aim to improve in a report?

    Accuracy (correctness of facts and language), coherence (logical flow and consistency of argument), and presentation (formatting and readability).

  26. What does 'coherence' mean when editing a report?

    That ideas connect logically and consistently, with clear transitions so the argument flows and the reader can follow the line of reasoning.

  27. Name four formatting elements to standardise before final submission.

    Consistent font and size, line spacing, heading styles, page numbering, and a uniform referencing style throughout.

  28. Why should a contents page and accurate page numbering be added before submission?

    They help the reader and assessor navigate the report, signal a professional standard of presentation, and meet formatting requirements.

  29. What final checks should be completed during submission preparation?

    Confirm word count is within limit, all sources are referenced, the production log is complete and signed, formatting is consistent, and the file/format meets the exam-board requirements.

  30. Why is meeting the word count requirement important, and what does going far over or under it signal?

    It evidences the ability to write concisely to a brief; going far over suggests poor editing/lack of focus, while going under suggests insufficient depth or research.

  31. What is usually excluded from the EPQ word count?

    The title page, contents page, references/bibliography, appendices, and often footnotes, tables and diagrams (exact rules depend on the exam board).

Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) Producing the Project Outcome FAQ

What is in the Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) Producing the Project Outcome syllabus?

Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) Producing the Project Outcome is split into 4 chapters: Writing the Dissertation, Creating an Artefact or Performance, Referencing and Academic Integrity and Reviewing and Refining the Product. Together they contain 16 topics and 13 sub-topics.

How many chapters are in Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) Producing the Project Outcome?

4 chapters, containing 16 topics and 13 sub-topics. The largest chapter is Writing the Dissertation, with 4 topics.

Are there flashcards for Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) Producing the Project Outcome?

Yes — a 51-card Producing the Project Outcome deck, printed in full in the flashcards section of this page and available in the Examius app with spaced repetition. The free plan covers one exam of your choice, including its flashcards; Examius Pro, a one-time purchase, unlocks every other exam and deck.