🇬🇧 Police Initial Recruitment Test (PIRT/SEARCH) · subject
Police Initial Recruitment Test (PIRT/SEARCH) Situational Judgement and Decision Making Syllabus
The Situational Judgement and Decision Making syllabus for Police Initial Recruitment Test (PIRT/SEARCH) in full: 4 chapters, 15 topics and 9 sub-topics, every one listed below, plus 51 Situational Judgement and Decision Making flashcards with answers.
Situational Judgement and Decision Making syllabus: all 4 chapters
Expand any chapter to see its topics and sub-topics.
-
Understanding the Situational Judgement Test
3 topics- Format and Question Types
- Most and least effective response items
- Rating and ranking response scales
- Video-based scenario presentation
- How Responses Are Scored Against the CVF
- Reading Scenarios Accurately and Fully
- Format and Question Types
-
Workplace Scenario Themes
5 topics- Handling Conflict with Colleagues
- Responding to Members of the Public
- Dealing with Vulnerable Individuals
- Managing Competing Priorities and Workload
- Witnessing Inappropriate Behaviour
-
Effective Decision Making
3 topics- The National Decision Model (NDM)
- Gathering information and intelligence
- Assessing threat, risk and developing a working strategy
- Considering powers and policy
- Identifying options and taking action with review
- Balancing Risk, Proportionality and Necessity
- Prioritising Welfare and Safety
- The National Decision Model (NDM)
-
Ethics and Professional Standards
4 topics- The Code of Ethics
- Standards of professional behaviour
- Honesty, integrity and challenging wrongdoing
- Recognising and Reporting Misconduct
- Confidentiality and Appropriate Use of Information
- Equality, Diversity and Avoiding Discrimination
- The Code of Ethics
Police Initial Recruitment Test (PIRT/SEARCH) Situational Judgement and Decision Making flashcards — 51 questions with answers
In the SEARCH/PIRT recruitment process, what does the Situational Judgement Test (SJT) assess?
It assesses how a candidate would respond to realistic, work-related scenarios a police officer might face, measuring judgement and behaviour against the College of Policing Competency and Values Framework (CVF) rather than testing factual police knowledge.
What format do questions in the police Situational Judgement Test typically take?
Each item presents a written scenario followed by several possible responses. Candidates usually either rate the effectiveness/appropriateness of each response on a scale, or rank/select the most and least effective actions.
Name the two main response formats used in police SJTs.
(1) Rating format - judge how effective or appropriate each individual response is; (2) Ranking/most-least format - choose the single most appropriate and least appropriate response from the options.
Against which framework are responses in the police SJT scored?
The College of Policing Competency and Values Framework (CVF), which defines the behaviours and values expected of everyone working in policing.
List the four core values in the College of Policing Competency and Values Framework (CVF).
Integrity, Impartiality, Public Service, and Transparency.
What are the three behavioural clusters of the CVF that group its competencies?
(1) Resolute, compassionate and committed; (2) Inclusive, enabling and visionary leadership; (3) Intelligent, creative and informed policing.
List the six competencies of the Competency and Values Framework (CVF).
Emotionally aware; Take ownership; Collaborative; Deliver, support and inspire; Analyse critically; and Innovative and open-minded.
Why is there no single 'trick' answer key for the police SJT?
Responses are scored by how well they align with CVF values and behaviours as agreed by subject-matter experts; the best answer is the one a competent, ethical officer would choose, not a hidden formula.
When reading an SJT scenario, why must you read it accurately and fully before answering?
Key details - who is involved, the level of risk, your role, time pressures and what has already happened - change the most appropriate response; missing or assuming details leads to choosing actions that are unrealistic or unsafe.
In an SJT scenario, what does it mean to answer 'in role'?
You should respond as a serving police officer or recruit would, applying policing values and your given remit - not as a private individual or a senior manager whose authority you do not have.
What is a common reading error candidates make in SJT scenarios?
Adding information not given (assumptions), ignoring stated constraints, or responding to what they think should be happening rather than the facts presented in the scenario.
What is generally the best first step when a scenario describes conflict with a colleague?
Address it directly, calmly and professionally with the colleague first - seeking to understand their view and resolve it at the lowest appropriate level - rather than ignoring it or immediately escalating over their head.
When is escalating a conflict with a colleague to a supervisor the appropriate response?
When the behaviour is serious (e.g. unlawful, discriminatory or unsafe), when direct resolution has failed, or when reporting is required by policy - not as the automatic first move for minor disagreements.
In conflict-with-colleagues SJT items, which response options are usually scored poorly?
Aggressive/confrontational responses, gossiping or complaining to others, ignoring the issue entirely, or undermining the colleague - none demonstrate the collaborative, emotionally aware behaviours the CVF expects.
When responding to a member of the public who is angry or upset, what behaviour does the CVF reward?
Staying calm, listening actively, showing empathy, treating them with respect and dignity, explaining what you can do, and de-escalating - demonstrating the 'emotionally aware' and 'public service' values.
In SJT scenarios involving the public, why is dismissive or defensive behaviour scored low?
It breaches the public-service value, damages public confidence and trust, and fails to show the emotional awareness and impartiality expected of officers, even when the member of the public is being difficult.
What defines a 'vulnerable individual' in a policing context?
A person who, due to age, disability, mental or physical health, situation or circumstances, is unable to protect themselves from harm, exploitation or abuse, or is at greater risk of harm.
What should an officer prioritise when a scenario involves a vulnerable individual?
Their immediate safety and welfare - assessing risk, taking action to safeguard them, communicating appropriately to their needs, and involving the right support or partner agencies.
In SJTs involving vulnerable people, why is it wrong to simply take their statement and move on?
Because failing to recognise and act on vulnerability risks leaving the person in danger; safeguarding and welfare must come before procedural convenience or speed.
When facing competing priorities and a heavy workload, what does effective SJT judgement look like?
Prioritise tasks by risk, threat, harm and urgency (those affecting safety first), manage time realistically, and communicate with supervisors/colleagues if you cannot complete everything - rather than ignoring tasks or hiding the problem.
Show the other 31 Situational Judgement and Decision Making flashcards
In a workload-pressure scenario, why is 'just do the easiest tasks first' usually a poor response?
Because prioritisation should be driven by risk and harm to people, not by what is convenient; leaving high-risk matters undone to clear easy ones can endanger the public and breaches 'take ownership'.
What is the recommended response when you witness a colleague behaving inappropriately?
Do not ignore or collude with it. Where safe and proportionate, challenge it at the time, and report it through the appropriate channels; serious misconduct must always be reported under your duty to do so.
Why is staying silent about a colleague's misconduct scored as a poor SJT response?
Officers have a positive duty to report misconduct; silence or covering for colleagues undermines integrity, transparency and public trust, and can itself be a breach of standards.
What is the National Decision Model (NDM) and who developed it?
The National Decision Model is the decision-making framework adopted by UK policing (developed by the College of Policing) used to make and review decisions in any situation, from incidents to planned operations.
What sits at the centre of the National Decision Model (NDM)?
The Code of Ethics / policing principles and values - every stage of the model is considered through the lens of ethical, value-based decision making.
List the five stages around the centre of the National Decision Model (NDM).
(1) Gather information and intelligence; (2) Assess threat and risk and develop a working strategy; (3) Consider powers and policy; (4) Identify options and contingencies; (5) Take action and review what happened.
Is the National Decision Model used in a fixed order, and what happens after taking action?
It is a continuous cycle, not a rigid one-off sequence; after taking action the officer reviews 'what happened' and the information feeds back, restarting the model as the situation evolves.
In the NDM, what does the 'Assess threat and risk and develop a working strategy' stage involve?
Judging the level of threat, harm and risk to people and the situation, and forming a flexible strategy/plan to manage it before committing to specific actions.
In the NDM stage 'Consider powers and policy', what is an officer checking?
Whether they have the legal powers, and what laws, policies and guidance apply, ensuring any action taken is lawful and within authority.
Define 'proportionality' as it applies to police decision making.
Ensuring that any action or use of power is no more than is reasonably needed to achieve a legitimate aim - the response must be balanced against the seriousness of the situation and its impact on people's rights.
Define 'necessity' in the context of police powers and decisions.
That the action is genuinely required to achieve the policing aim and that a less intrusive means would not suffice - if the aim can be met another way, the action is not necessary.
How do risk, proportionality and necessity work together in a decision?
An officer assesses the risk/threat, then chooses a response that is necessary (genuinely needed) and proportionate (no more than required) to that level of risk, balancing public protection against individual rights.
What does it mean that policing decisions should 'balance risk' rather than eliminate it?
Some risk is inherent in policing; good decisions manage and reduce risk to an acceptable level proportionate to the threat, rather than taking excessively cautious or excessively forceful action to remove all risk.
When safety/welfare conflicts with completing paperwork or procedure in an SJT, which takes priority?
The safety and welfare of people (the public, victims, colleagues and the vulnerable) always takes priority over administrative or procedural convenience.
What is the 'threat to life' or 'preservation of life' principle in policing priorities?
Protecting life and preventing serious harm is the highest policing priority; where there is a risk to life or safety, that response should come before lower-priority tasks.
What is the Code of Ethics in UK policing?
A code published by the College of Policing setting out the principles and standards of professional behaviour expected of everyone who works in policing, underpinning ethical decision making and the CVF.
How many policing principles does the Code of Ethics set out, and can you name several?
It sets out nine principles: accountability, fairness, honesty, integrity, leadership, objectivity, openness, respect, and selflessness.
What are the standards/expected behaviours covered by the Code of Ethics (Standards of Professional Behaviour)?
Areas including honesty and integrity; authority, respect and courtesy; equality and diversity; use of force; orders and instructions; duties and responsibilities; confidentiality; fitness for duty; discreditable conduct; and challenging and reporting improper conduct.
Under the Code of Ethics, what positive duty do officers have regarding wrongdoing?
A duty to challenge and report improper conduct - they must report, challenge or take action against the conduct of colleagues that falls below the standards expected, even when it is uncomfortable.
What is the difference between misconduct and gross misconduct in policing?
Misconduct is a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour; gross misconduct is a breach so serious that dismissal would be justified. Both must be recognised and reported appropriately.
What should you do if you suspect or witness misconduct by a colleague?
Report it promptly through the appropriate channels (supervisor, professional standards department, or confidential reporting line), following your duty to report, regardless of the colleague's rank or your friendship with them.
Why is reporting misconduct important to public confidence?
Policing operates by consent and trust; allowing misconduct to go unreported erodes integrity, transparency and accountability, damaging the public's confidence in the whole service.
What is the rule on confidentiality of police information?
Information obtained in the course of duty must be treated as confidential and only accessed, used or disclosed for legitimate policing purposes - never for personal reasons, curiosity or to benefit others.
Give an example of inappropriate use of police information that would breach standards.
Looking up a friend's, relative's or your own record on police systems out of curiosity, sharing case details on social media, or disclosing information to someone not entitled to it - all are misuse of information.
What principle governs accessing police databases and records?
The 'policing purpose' / need-to-know principle: you may only access information you are authorised to and genuinely need for your role; every access can be audited and must be justifiable.
What does 'equality and diversity' require of an officer in their behaviour?
Acting with fairness and impartiality, treating all people with respect and without prejudice, and not discriminating against anyone based on a protected characteristic or any other improper ground.
Name the nine protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010.
Age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex, and sexual orientation.
In an SJT, what is the appropriate response if a colleague makes a discriminatory comment or joke?
Challenge it appropriately and do not condone or join in; depending on seriousness, report it - showing the 'inclusive' value and the duty to uphold equality and diversity standards.
What is the difference between direct and indirect discrimination?
Direct discrimination is treating someone less favourably because of a protected characteristic; indirect discrimination is applying a policy or practice that appears neutral but puts people with a protected characteristic at a particular disadvantage without justification.
Why must officers avoid acting on stereotypes or unconscious bias when dealing with the public?
Because the values of impartiality and fairness require decisions based on facts and behaviour, not assumptions about a person's group; bias undermines legitimacy, trust and the lawful, proportionate use of powers.
Summarise the overall mindset that scores highest across the police SJT.
Acting with integrity and impartiality, prioritising safety, welfare and public protection, making lawful, necessary and proportionate decisions via the NDM, communicating with empathy, taking ownership, and reporting/challenging wrongdoing - consistently reflecting the Code of Ethics and CVF.
Police Initial Recruitment Test (PIRT/SEARCH) Situational Judgement and Decision Making FAQ
What is in the Police Initial Recruitment Test (PIRT/SEARCH) Situational Judgement and Decision Making syllabus?
Police Initial Recruitment Test (PIRT/SEARCH) Situational Judgement and Decision Making is split into 4 chapters: Understanding the Situational Judgement Test, Workplace Scenario Themes, Effective Decision Making and Ethics and Professional Standards. Together they contain 15 topics and 9 sub-topics.
How many chapters are in Police Initial Recruitment Test (PIRT/SEARCH) Situational Judgement and Decision Making?
4 chapters, containing 15 topics and 9 sub-topics. The largest chapter is Workplace Scenario Themes, with 5 topics.
Are there flashcards for Police Initial Recruitment Test (PIRT/SEARCH) Situational Judgement and Decision Making?
Yes — a 51-card Situational Judgement and Decision Making deck, printed in full in the flashcards section of this page and available in the Examius app with spaced repetition. The free plan covers one exam of your choice, including its flashcards; Examius Pro, a one-time purchase, unlocks every other exam and deck.