🇮🇳 GATE Physics · subject
GATE Physics Quantum Mechanics Syllabus
The Quantum Mechanics syllabus for GATE Physics in full: 6 chapters and 15 topics, every one listed below, plus 50 Quantum Mechanics flashcards with answers.
Quantum Mechanics syllabus: all 6 chapters
Expand any chapter to see its topics and sub-topics.
-
Postulates of Quantum Mechanics
4 topics- Uncertainty Principle
- Schrodinger Equation
- Dirac Bra-Ket Notation
- Linear Vectors and Operators in Hilbert Space
-
One Dimensional Potentials
5 topics- Step Potential
- Finite Rectangular Well
- Tunneling from a Potential Barrier
- Particle in a Box
- Harmonic Oscillator
-
Two and Three Dimensional Systems
4 topics- Concept of Degeneracy
- Hydrogen Atom
- Angular Momentum and Spin
- Addition of Angular Momenta
-
Variational Method and WKB Approximation
1 topic- Time Independent Perturbation Theory
-
Elementary Scattering Theory
1 topic- Born Approximation
-
Symmetries in Quantum Mechanical Systems
overviewNo separate topics listed for this chapter.
GATE Physics Quantum Mechanics flashcards — 50 questions with answers
State the Heisenberg uncertainty principle for position and momentum, including the limiting value.
The product of the uncertainties in position and momentum satisfies $$\Delta x \,\Delta p_{x} \geq \frac{\hbar}{2},$$ where $\hbar = \frac{h}{2\pi}$. It is impossible to simultaneously know both $x$ and $p_{x}$ with arbitrary precision.
Write the energy-time uncertainty relation and explain its physical meaning.
$$\Delta E \,\Delta t \geq \frac{\hbar}{2}.$$ A state that exists for a finite time $\Delta t$ has an energy spread $\Delta E$; only states living infinitely long have perfectly sharp energy.
What is the general uncertainty relation between two observables $\hat{A}$ and $\hat{B}$?
$$\Delta A\,\Delta B \geq \frac{1}{2}\left| \langle [\hat{A},\hat{B}] \rangle \right|,$$ where $[\hat{A},\hat{B}] = \hat{A}\hat{B} - \hat{B}\hat{A}$. Observables with a nonzero commutator cannot be measured simultaneously to arbitrary precision.
Write the time-dependent Schrodinger equation in one dimension.
$$i\hbar \frac{\partial \Psi(x,t)}{\partial t} = -\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}\frac{\partial^{2}\Psi(x,t)}{\partial x^{2}} + V(x,t)\,\Psi(x,t).$$
Write the time-independent Schrodinger equation in three dimensions.
$$-\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}\nabla^{2}\psi(\vec{r}) + V(\vec{r})\,\psi(\vec{r}) = E\,\psi(\vec{r}),$$ obtained by separation of variables with $\Psi(\vec{r},t) = \psi(\vec{r})\,e^{-iEt/\hbar}$.
What is the probability current density $j(x,t)$ in one dimension, and what equation does it satisfy with the probability density?
$$j(x,t) = \frac{\hbar}{2mi}\left( \Psi^{*}\frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} - \Psi\frac{\partial \Psi^{*}}{\partial x} \right).$$ It satisfies the continuity equation $\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} + \frac{\partial j}{\partial x} = 0$ with $\rho = |\Psi|^{2}$.
State the normalization condition and the standard boundary/continuity conditions on a physically acceptable wavefunction.
Normalization: $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |\psi|^{2}\,dx = 1$. The wavefunction $\psi$ must be single-valued, finite, and continuous everywhere; $\frac{d\psi}{dx}$ must also be continuous wherever $V$ is finite.
In Dirac bra-ket notation, what are a ket, a bra, and how is the inner product written?
A ket $|\psi\rangle$ is a state vector; the bra $\langle\psi|$ is its dual (Hermitian conjugate). The inner product is $\langle\phi|\psi\rangle$, a complex number with $\langle\phi|\psi\rangle = \langle\psi|\phi\rangle^{*}$.
Write the completeness (closure) relation and the orthonormality condition for a discrete orthonormal basis $\{|n\rangle\}$.
Orthonormality: $\langle m|n\rangle = \delta_{mn}$. Completeness: $$\sum_{n} |n\rangle\langle n| = \hat{I},$$ where $\hat{I}$ is the identity operator.
In bra-ket notation, how is the expectation value of an operator $\hat{A}$ in a normalized state $|\psi\rangle$ written, and what is the projection operator onto $|n\rangle$?
Expectation value: $\langle \hat{A} \rangle = \langle\psi|\hat{A}|\psi\rangle$. The projection operator onto $|n\rangle$ is $\hat{P}_{n} = |n\rangle\langle n|$, which satisfies $\hat{P}_{n}^{2} = \hat{P}_{n}$.
Define a Hermitian operator and state two key properties of its eigenvalues and eigenvectors.
An operator is Hermitian if $\hat{A} = \hat{A}^{\dagger}$, i.e. $\langle\phi|\hat{A}\psi\rangle = \langle\hat{A}\phi|\psi\rangle$. Its eigenvalues are real, and eigenvectors belonging to distinct eigenvalues are orthogonal. All physical observables are represented by Hermitian operators.
Define a Hilbert space in the context of quantum mechanics.
A Hilbert space is a complete, complex inner-product vector space. Quantum states are vectors in this space, observables are linear (Hermitian) operators on it, and completeness guarantees convergence of vector expansions in a basis.
Define a unitary operator and state its defining property and physical role.
A unitary operator satisfies $\hat{U}^{\dagger}\hat{U} = \hat{U}\hat{U}^{\dagger} = \hat{I}$, so $\hat{U}^{-1} = \hat{U}^{\dagger}$. It preserves inner products and norms, and represents symmetry transformations and time evolution, e.g. $\hat{U}(t) = e^{-i\hat{H}t/\hbar}$.
What is the canonical commutation relation between position and momentum operators, and the momentum operator in position space?
$$[\hat{x},\hat{p}] = i\hbar.$$ In the position representation, $\hat{p} = -i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial x}$ and $\hat{x} = x$.
For a step potential of height $V_{0}$ with incident energy $E > V_{0}$, qualitatively what happens, and is there reflection?
The particle is partly transmitted and partly reflected. Unlike classical physics, there is a nonzero reflection probability even though $E > V_{0}$. The transmitted wave has reduced wave number $k_{2} = \sqrt{2m(E-V_{0})}/\hbar < k_{1}$.
For a step potential of height $V_{0}$ with $E < V_{0}$, what is the reflection coefficient and the nature of the wavefunction inside the step?
The reflection coefficient is $R = 1$ (total reflection). Inside the step the wavefunction is evanescent (exponentially decaying), $\psi \sim e^{-\kappa x}$ with $\kappa = \frac{\sqrt{2m(V_{0}-E)}}{\hbar}$, so the penetration probability is nonzero but no net transmission occurs.
Write the reflection coefficient $R$ for a step potential with $E > V_{0}$ in terms of wave numbers $k_{1}$ and $k_{2}$.
$$R = \left( \frac{k_{1}-k_{2}}{k_{1}+k_{2}} \right)^{2},$$ with $k_{1} = \frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{\hbar}$ and $k_{2} = \frac{\sqrt{2m(E-V_{0})}}{\hbar}$. Transmission satisfies $T = 1 - R$.
For a finite rectangular (square) potential well, how do the number and nature of bound states compare with the infinite well?
A finite well supports only a finite number of bound states (at least one always exists in 1D). The wavefunctions leak (decay exponentially) into the classically forbidden regions outside the well, and bound-state energies are lower than the corresponding infinite-well levels.
For a finite square well, what type of equation determines the bound-state energies and why must it be solved graphically or numerically?
Matching $\psi$ and $\psi'$ at the walls yields transcendental equations such as $k\tan(ka) = \kappa$ (even states) and $k\cot(ka) = -\kappa$ (odd states), where $k=\sqrt{2mE}/\hbar$ inside and $\kappa=\sqrt{2m(V_0-E)}/\hbar$ outside. These have no closed-form solution and must be solved graphically/numerically.
What is quantum tunneling through a potential barrier?
Tunneling is the quantum phenomenon where a particle with energy $E < V_{0}$ has a nonzero probability of transmitting through a barrier, even though it is classically forbidden. Inside the barrier the wavefunction decays exponentially but remains finite on the far side.
Show the other 30 Quantum Mechanics flashcards
Give the approximate transmission coefficient for tunneling through a wide/high rectangular barrier of width $L$ and height $V_{0}$ (with $E < V_{0}$).
$$T \approx e^{-2\kappa L}, \qquad \kappa = \frac{\sqrt{2m(V_{0}-E)}}{\hbar}.$$ Transmission falls off exponentially with barrier width and with the square root of $(V_{0}-E)$.
State the WKB (Gamow) tunneling formula for transmission through an arbitrary smooth barrier.
$$T \approx \exp\!\left( -\frac{2}{\hbar}\int_{x_{1}}^{x_{2}} \sqrt{2m\,[V(x)-E]}\;dx \right),$$ where $x_{1}$ and $x_{2}$ are the classical turning points where $V(x)=E$.
Write the energy eigenvalues for a particle in a one-dimensional infinite square well of width $L$.
$$E_{n} = \frac{n^{2}\pi^{2}\hbar^{2}}{2mL^{2}}, \qquad n = 1,2,3,\dots$$ Energy is quantized and there is no $n=0$ state (zero state would violate the uncertainty principle).
Write the normalized eigenfunctions for a 1D infinite square well of width $L$ (from $0$ to $L$).
$$\psi_{n}(x) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}\,\sin\!\left(\frac{n\pi x}{L}\right), \qquad n = 1,2,3,\dots$$ with $\psi_{n}(0)=\psi_{n}(L)=0$.
For a 1D infinite square well, what is the ground-state (zero-point) energy and why can't it be zero?
Ground state ($n=1$): $$E_{1} = \frac{\pi^{2}\hbar^{2}}{2mL^{2}}.$$ It cannot be zero because $\psi \equiv 0$ is not normalizable, and a zero-energy localized state would violate the uncertainty principle $\Delta x\,\Delta p \geq \hbar/2$.
Write the energy levels of a 3D cubic infinite well of side $L$ and give the degeneracy reasoning.
$$E_{n_x n_y n_z} = \frac{\pi^{2}\hbar^{2}}{2mL^{2}}\left(n_x^{2}+n_y^{2}+n_z^{2}\right), \quad n_i = 1,2,\dots$$ Different sets $(n_x,n_y,n_z)$ giving the same $n_x^2+n_y^2+n_z^2$ have the same energy, producing degeneracy.
Write the energy eigenvalues of the 1D quantum harmonic oscillator.
$$E_{n} = \left(n + \tfrac{1}{2}\right)\hbar\omega, \qquad n = 0,1,2,\dots$$ The levels are equally spaced by $\hbar\omega$, and the zero-point energy is $E_{0} = \tfrac{1}{2}\hbar\omega$.
Define the ladder (raising and lowering) operators for the harmonic oscillator and give their commutator.
$$\hat{a} = \sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}\left(\hat{x} + \frac{i\hat{p}}{m\omega}\right), \quad \hat{a}^{\dagger} = \sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}\left(\hat{x} - \frac{i\hat{p}}{m\omega}\right),$$ with $[\hat{a},\hat{a}^{\dagger}] = 1$. The Hamiltonian is $\hat{H} = \hbar\omega(\hat{a}^{\dagger}\hat{a} + \tfrac{1}{2})$.
State the action of the raising and lowering operators on the number state $|n\rangle$.
$$\hat{a}|n\rangle = \sqrt{n}\,|n-1\rangle, \qquad \hat{a}^{\dagger}|n\rangle = \sqrt{n+1}\,|n+1\rangle.$$ Also $\hat{a}^{\dagger}\hat{a}|n\rangle = n|n\rangle$ (number operator) and $\hat{a}|0\rangle = 0$.
Write the ground-state wavefunction of the 1D harmonic oscillator.
$$\psi_{0}(x) = \left(\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}\right)^{1/4} \exp\!\left(-\frac{m\omega x^{2}}{2\hbar}\right).$$ It is a Gaussian with no nodes.
Define degeneracy in quantum mechanics and give its usual physical origin.
Degeneracy occurs when two or more linearly independent eigenstates share the same energy eigenvalue. The number of such states is the degree of degeneracy. It usually arises from a symmetry of the Hamiltonian (e.g. rotational symmetry giving $(2l+1)$-fold degeneracy in $m_l$).
What is the total degeneracy of the $n$th energy level of the hydrogen atom (ignoring spin, then including spin)?
Ignoring spin: $\sum_{l=0}^{n-1}(2l+1) = n^{2}$. Including electron spin (factor 2): $2n^{2}$. This degeneracy in $l$ is a special ('accidental') symmetry of the pure Coulomb potential.
Write the energy eigenvalues of the hydrogen atom and the value for the ground state.
$$E_{n} = -\frac{13.6\ \text{eV}}{n^{2}} = -\frac{m e^{4}}{8 \varepsilon_{0}^{2} h^{2} n^{2}}, \qquad n = 1,2,3,\dots$$ Ground state: $E_{1} = -13.6\ \text{eV}$.
List the four quantum numbers of the hydrogen atom and their allowed ranges.
Principal $n = 1,2,3,\dots$; orbital (azimuthal) $l = 0,1,\dots,n-1$; magnetic $m_{l} = -l,\dots,0,\dots,+l$; spin $m_{s} = \pm\tfrac{1}{2}$. Energy depends only on $n$ (Coulomb degeneracy).
Write the value of the Bohr radius $a_{0}$ and the hydrogen ground-state radial wavefunction.
Bohr radius: $a_{0} = \frac{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}\hbar^{2}}{m e^{2}} \approx 0.529\ \text{\AA}$. Ground-state wavefunction: $$\psi_{100}(r) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi}\,a_{0}^{3/2}}\,e^{-r/a_{0}}.$$
State the eigenvalues of $\hat{L}^{2}$ and $\hat{L}_{z}$ for orbital angular momentum.
$$\hat{L}^{2}|l,m\rangle = l(l+1)\hbar^{2}|l,m\rangle, \qquad \hat{L}_{z}|l,m\rangle = m\hbar\,|l,m\rangle,$$ with $l = 0,1,2,\dots$ and $m = -l,\dots,+l$.
Write the commutation relations among the angular momentum components.
$$[\hat{L}_{x},\hat{L}_{y}] = i\hbar \hat{L}_{z}, \quad [\hat{L}_{y},\hat{L}_{z}] = i\hbar \hat{L}_{x}, \quad [\hat{L}_{z},\hat{L}_{x}] = i\hbar \hat{L}_{y},$$ compactly $[\hat{L}_{i},\hat{L}_{j}] = i\hbar\,\epsilon_{ijk}\hat{L}_{k}$. Also $[\hat{L}^{2},\hat{L}_{i}] = 0$.
Define the angular momentum raising and lowering operators and their action on $|l,m\rangle$.
$\hat{L}_{\pm} = \hat{L}_{x} \pm i\hat{L}_{y}$, with $$\hat{L}_{\pm}|l,m\rangle = \hbar\sqrt{l(l+1)-m(m\pm 1)}\;|l,m\pm 1\rangle.$$ They raise/lower $m$ by one unit while leaving $l$ fixed.
Give the spin operators for a spin-1/2 particle in terms of the Pauli matrices, and the eigenvalues of $\hat{S}^{2}$ and $\hat{S}_{z}$.
$\hat{\vec{S}} = \frac{\hbar}{2}\vec{\sigma}$ with $$\sigma_{x}=\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\1&0\end{pmatrix},\ \sigma_{y}=\begin{pmatrix}0&-i\\i&0\end{pmatrix},\ \sigma_{z}=\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&-1\end{pmatrix}.$$ $\hat{S}^{2}$ eigenvalue $= \frac{3}{4}\hbar^{2}$; $\hat{S}_{z}$ eigenvalues $= \pm\frac{\hbar}{2}$.
State the Pauli matrices' key algebraic properties.
Each squares to the identity: $\sigma_{i}^{2} = I$. They anticommute: $\{\sigma_{i},\sigma_{j}\} = 2\delta_{ij}I$. Commutators: $[\sigma_{i},\sigma_{j}] = 2i\,\epsilon_{ijk}\sigma_{k}$. They are Hermitian, traceless, and unitary with $\det\sigma_i = -1$.
In the addition of two angular momenta $j_{1}$ and $j_{2}$, what values can the total angular momentum $j$ take?
$$j = |j_{1}-j_{2}|,\ |j_{1}-j_{2}|+1,\ \dots,\ j_{1}+j_{2},$$ in integer steps. For each $j$, $m = -j,\dots,+j$, and the total number of states is $(2j_{1}+1)(2j_{2}+1)$.
When adding two spin-1/2 particles, what total-spin states result and how are they classified?
They combine into a triplet ($s=1$, symmetric, 3 states: $m_s = +1,0,-1$) and a singlet ($s=0$, antisymmetric, 1 state). Dimension check: $2\times 2 = 3 + 1 = 4$ states.
What are Clebsch-Gordan coefficients and what do they accomplish?
Clebsch-Gordan coefficients $\langle j_{1}m_{1};j_{2}m_{2}|j\,m\rangle$ are the expansion coefficients relating the coupled basis $|j,m\rangle$ to the uncoupled product basis $|j_{1}m_{1}\rangle|j_{2}m_{2}\rangle$. They are nonzero only when $m = m_{1}+m_{2}$ and $|j_1-j_2|\le j\le j_1+j_2$.
In time-independent (non-degenerate) perturbation theory with $\hat{H} = \hat{H}_{0} + \lambda \hat{H}'$, write the first-order energy correction.
$$E_{n}^{(1)} = \langle \psi_{n}^{(0)} | \hat{H}' | \psi_{n}^{(0)} \rangle,$$ the expectation value of the perturbation in the unperturbed state $|\psi_{n}^{(0)}\rangle$.
Write the second-order energy correction and the first-order wavefunction correction in non-degenerate perturbation theory.
$$E_{n}^{(2)} = \sum_{m\neq n} \frac{|\langle \psi_{m}^{(0)}|\hat{H}'|\psi_{n}^{(0)}\rangle|^{2}}{E_{n}^{(0)} - E_{m}^{(0)}},$$ $$|\psi_{n}^{(1)}\rangle = \sum_{m\neq n} \frac{\langle \psi_{m}^{(0)}|\hat{H}'|\psi_{n}^{(0)}\rangle}{E_{n}^{(0)} - E_{m}^{(0)}}\,|\psi_{m}^{(0)}\rangle.$$
Why does non-degenerate perturbation theory fail for degenerate levels, and how is it fixed?
The energy denominators $E_{n}^{(0)} - E_{m}^{(0)}$ vanish for degenerate states, giving divergences. One uses degenerate perturbation theory: diagonalize the perturbation $\hat{H}'$ within the degenerate subspace; the eigenvalues of that matrix are the first-order corrections, and the perturbation may lift the degeneracy.
What is the Born approximation used for, and what is its central physical assumption?
The Born approximation is a method in scattering theory to compute the scattering amplitude $f(\theta)$ for a potential $V(\vec{r})$. It assumes the scattering potential is weak, so the incident wave is only slightly perturbed and can be approximated by a plane wave inside the integral (first-order treatment).
Write the first Born approximation for the scattering amplitude $f(\theta)$.
$$f(\theta) = -\frac{m}{2\pi\hbar^{2}} \int e^{-i\vec{q}\cdot\vec{r}}\, V(\vec{r})\, d^{3}r,$$ where $\vec{q} = \vec{k}' - \vec{k}$ is the momentum transfer with $|\vec{q}| = 2k\sin(\theta/2)$. The amplitude is essentially the Fourier transform of the potential.
How is the differential scattering cross-section related to the scattering amplitude?
$$\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega} = |f(\theta)|^{2}.$$ The total cross-section is $\sigma = \int |f(\theta)|^{2}\,d\Omega$.
For a spherically symmetric potential, simplify the Born approximation scattering amplitude.
$$f(\theta) = -\frac{2m}{\hbar^{2}q}\int_{0}^{\infty} r\,V(r)\,\sin(qr)\,dr,$$ with $q = 2k\sin(\theta/2)$. The angular integration reduces the 3D Fourier transform to this radial form.
GATE Physics Quantum Mechanics FAQ
What is in the GATE Physics Quantum Mechanics syllabus?
GATE Physics Quantum Mechanics is split into 6 chapters: Postulates of Quantum Mechanics, One Dimensional Potentials, Two and Three Dimensional Systems, Variational Method and WKB Approximation, Elementary Scattering Theory and Symmetries in Quantum Mechanical Systems. Together they contain 15 topics.
How many chapters are in GATE Physics Quantum Mechanics?
6 chapters, containing 15 topics. The largest chapter is One Dimensional Potentials, with 5 topics.
Are there flashcards for GATE Physics Quantum Mechanics?
Yes — a 50-card Quantum Mechanics deck, printed in full in the flashcards section of this page and available in the Examius app with spaced repetition. The free plan covers one exam of your choice, including its flashcards; Examius Pro, a one-time purchase, unlocks every other exam and deck.