🇺🇸 Patent Bar Examination (USPTO Registration Exam) · subject

Patent Bar Examination (USPTO Registration Exam) Patent Prosecution and Examination Procedure Syllabus

The Patent Prosecution and Examination Procedure syllabus for Patent Bar Examination (USPTO Registration Exam) in full: 5 chapters, 20 topics and 11 sub-topics, every one listed below, plus 54 Patent Prosecution and Examination Procedure flashcards with answers.

5Chapters
20Topics
11Sub-topics
54Flashcards

Patent Prosecution and Examination Procedure syllabus: all 5 chapters

Expand any chapter to see its topics and sub-topics.

  1. The Examination Process

    4 topics
    • Application flow from filing to allowance
    • Restriction and election of species
      • Independent and distinct inventions
      • Election with or without traverse
      • Rejoinder of claims
    • First and final Office actions
    • Examiner interviews and interview practice
  2. Responding to Office Actions

    4 topics
    • Amendments to claims, specification, and drawings
      • Proper amendment format under Rule 1.121
      • Prohibition on new matter
    • Arguments and traversal of rejections
    • Reply requirements and completeness
    • After-final practice
      • Advisory actions
      • After Final Consideration Pilot
  3. Time Periods, Extensions, and Abandonment

    4 topics
    • Statutory and shortened statutory periods for reply
    • Extensions of time under Rule 1.136(a) and (b)
    • Abandonment of applications
    • Revival of abandoned applications
      • Unintentional delay standard
      • Petitions to revive
  4. Continued Examination and Allowance

    4 topics
    • Request for Continued Examination (RCE)
    • Notice of Allowance and issue fee payment
    • Amendments after allowance (Rule 1.312)
    • Issuance of the patent and patent term
  5. Priority, Benefit, and Foreign Filing

    4 topics
    • Domestic benefit claims under 35 USC 120 and 119(e)
    • Foreign priority under 35 USC 119(a)-(d)
      • Certified copies and priority documents
      • Time limits for priority claims
    • Foreign filing licenses and secrecy
    • Restoration of priority and benefit rights

Patent Bar Examination (USPTO Registration Exam) Patent Prosecution and Examination Procedure flashcards — 54 questions with answers

  1. In a typical U.S. nonprovisional application, what is the general sequence of events from filing to allowance?

    Filing → assignment to an art unit/examiner → (possible restriction requirement) → first Office action on the merits → applicant's reply/amendment → (possible interview) → final Office action or allowance → if rejected, after-final practice/RCE/appeal → Notice of Allowance → issue fee paid → patent grant.

  2. What is a 'first action allowance,' and is it permitted?

    It is allowance of an application in the first Office action without any prior rejection. It is permitted; the examiner issues a Notice of Allowability/Allowance directly when all claims are in condition for allowance.

  3. What is a restriction requirement under 35 U.S.C. 121 / 37 CFR 1.142?

    An examiner's requirement that an applicant elect a single one of two or more independent or distinct inventions claimed in one application for prosecution, because they are not capable of search/examination together without serious burden.

  4. What is the difference between 'independent' and 'distinct' inventions for restriction purposes?

    Independent inventions are unconnected in design, operation, and effect. Distinct inventions are related but are separately patentable from each other (e.g., combination/subcombination) and would impose a serious search/examination burden if examined together.

  5. What is an election of species requirement?

    When claims are drawn to multiple species (specific embodiments) of a generic invention, the examiner requires the applicant to elect a single species for examination, typically when there is no allowable generic (linking) claim or to search the elected species first.

  6. Must a restriction requirement be traversed to preserve the right to a divisional, and what is the effect of traversing?

    An applicant may elect with or without traversal. Traversal (election under protest) preserves the right to petition the requirement and to argue against it; a non-traversed election waives the right to later challenge the requirement. Either way, non-elected inventions may be pursued in a divisional with 35 U.S.C. 121 safe-harbor protection against double patenting.

  7. What is a 'provisional election' in response to a telephone restriction requirement?

    When an examiner makes a restriction requirement by telephone, the applicant may give an oral provisional election (with or without traversal); the election is provisional pending issuance of the written action confirming the requirement.

  8. What characterizes a 'first Office action on the merits' (FAOM)?

    The first substantive examination of the claims, addressing patentability—rejections under 35 U.S.C. 101, 102, 103, 112, objections, and any allowable subject matter—setting a shortened statutory period for reply (typically 3 months).

  9. When may an examiner properly make a second (or later) Office action final?

    When the rejections are necessitated by applicant's amendment, or when all rejections are the same/repeated and the application is in the same posture (i.e., the rejection was not newly necessitated except by amendment or new information from an IDS without the required fee/statement).

  10. What is the shortened statutory period for reply to a final Office action, and from what does the 6-month statutory deadline run?

    The shortened statutory period is 3 months from the mailing date. The maximum 6-month statutory period (35 U.S.C. 133) also runs from the mailing date of the final action; extensions cannot go beyond 6 months.

  11. For a final Office action, how is the period for paying any extension fee determined if the applicant files a reply within 2 months?

    Under the 'two-month rule,' if a reply to a final action is filed within 2 months and the Office mails an advisory action after the 3-month shortened period, the shortened statutory period for purposes of extension-fee calculation runs from the mailing date of the advisory action (but never beyond the 6-month statutory limit).

  12. What is the purpose of an examiner interview, and what may be discussed?

    An interview lets applicant/representative and examiner discuss the application to advance prosecution—claim interpretation, prior art, proposed amendments, and patentability issues—to reach agreement or clarify positions. It does not by itself constitute a reply to an Office action.

  13. Is an interview a matter of right before the first Office action?

    No. Interviews before the first Office action are generally not granted as of right in a regular continuing/new application (except in certain programs); after the first action, an interview is normally granted upon request when it will advance prosecution. A first-action interview requires a program/pilot or examiner agreement.

  14. What must be made of record after every examiner interview?

    A written Interview Summary. The substance of the interview must be made of record (Form PTOL-413/413A); if the examiner does not, the applicant must file a record of the substance of the interview.

  15. After a final rejection, is an interview a matter of right?

    No. After final rejection, an interview is not a matter of right; it may be granted at the examiner's discretion if it will help place the application in condition for allowance or resolve issues for appeal.

  16. What are the three categories of amendment under 37 CFR 1.121, and how must claim amendments be presented?

    Amendments to (1) the specification, (2) the claims, and (3) the drawings. Claim amendments must present the full claim text with status identifiers (e.g., (Original), (Currently amended), (Canceled), (New), (Withdrawn)) and show changes with underlining (additions) and strikethrough/brackets (deletions).

  17. How must amendments to the specification (other than claims) be made under 37 CFR 1.121?

    By replacement paragraph(s) marked to show additions (underlining) and deletions (strikethrough/brackets), by an added paragraph, or by replacement section—not by interlineation. Each amended paragraph is presented in its entirety with markings; clean substitute specifications may be required.

  18. How are drawing amendments made, and what marking is used?

    Drawing changes are submitted as replacement sheets (each labeled 'Replacement Sheet') showing all figures from the sheet; proposed changes may first be shown on an 'annotated sheet' marked in red or as instructed. New sheets are labeled 'New Sheet.' No changes are entered until approved.

  19. What is the difference between an 'amendment' and an 'argument/traversal' in a reply?

    An amendment changes the claims/specification/drawings; an argument (traversal) is the applicant's reasoning, with or without amendment, asserting that a rejection is improper. A reply must distinctly and specifically respond to every ground of rejection.

  20. To be a complete reply that avoids abandonment, what must a reply to an Office action do?

    It must be a bona fide attempt to advance prosecution and respond to every rejection, objection, and requirement—either by amendment, by specific argument traversing each ground, or by compliance—covering all outstanding issues, not just some.

Show the other 34 Patent Prosecution and Examination Procedure flashcards
  1. What happens if a reply is responsive to some but not all grounds of rejection (a 'bona fide' but incomplete reply) before the period expires?

    If the reply is a bona fide attempt and substantially complete but omits something (e.g., one rejection), the examiner may give a short new time period (often 1 month or the remainder of the statutory period, whichever is longer) to complete the reply, rather than holding the application abandoned.

  2. What is 'after-final' practice, and what options does an applicant have after a final rejection?

    Options include: file an amendment under 37 CFR 1.116, request an interview, file an After Final Consideration Pilot (AFCP 2.0) request, file an RCE under 1.114, file a Notice of Appeal to the PTAB, abandon, or pay extensions while pursuing these—all within the 6-month statutory window.

  3. What is the standard for entry of an amendment after final rejection under 37 CFR 1.116?

    After-final amendments are entered as a matter of right only if they cancel claims, comply with formal requirements, or place the application in condition for allowance; otherwise entry is discretionary and an amendment raising new issues requiring further search/consideration may be refused entry.

  4. Does filing an after-final amendment toll or stay the period for reply?

    No. The shortened statutory period (and 6-month statutory limit) continues to run; an after-final amendment that does not place the case in allowance does not stop the clock, so extensions of time may be needed to avoid abandonment.

  5. Distinguish a 'statutory period' from a 'shortened statutory period' for reply.

    The statutory period is the maximum 6 months set by 35 U.S.C. 133. A shortened statutory period (SSP) is the shorter time (commonly 1, 2, or 3 months) the Office sets in an action; an applicant may extend the SSP with fees up to—but never beyond—the 6-month statutory maximum.

  6. Can the 6-month statutory period for reply be extended by any extension of time?

    No. No extension under 37 CFR 1.136(a) or (b) can carry a reply beyond 6 months from the mailing date of the action; reply after 6 months results in abandonment.

  7. What is an extension of time under 37 CFR 1.136(a)?

    An automatic (as-of-right) extension obtained simply by paying the appropriate fee (up to 5 months); no showing of cause is required. It may be requested up front or made retroactively when filing the reply, but cannot extend beyond the 6-month statutory limit.

  8. What is an extension of time under 37 CFR 1.136(b), and when is it used?

    An extension 'for cause,' requiring a petition showing sufficient cause, used when 1.136(a) is unavailable (e.g., the action forbids automatic extensions, or the period is not subject to 1.136(a)). It also cannot extend beyond any applicable statutory maximum.

  9. Can a 37 CFR 1.136(a) automatic extension be obtained after the period for reply has already passed?

    Yes. A 1.136(a) extension may be filed retroactively with the reply and the proper fee (within the maximum 5-month extension and 6-month statutory limit); the petition/fee is effective to extend the period retroactively, reviving timeliness.

  10. What are the principal ways an application becomes abandoned?

    Failure to timely reply to an Office action, failure to pay the issue fee, express abandonment by the applicant, failure to file required parts, or failure to prosecute (e.g., insufficient/incomplete reply). Abandonment occurs by operation of law once the statutory period lapses without proper reply.

  11. What is express (formal) abandonment?

    A written declaration of abandonment signed by the applicant or attorney/agent of record and filed with the Office; it must be recognized/acknowledged before the abandonment is effective, and is sometimes filed to permit a continuation to issue or to avoid publication.

  12. What are the two standards historically used for reviving an unintentionally vs. unavoidably abandoned application?

    Current practice (37 CFR 1.137) uses a single 'unintentional' standard: a petition to revive must state that the entire delay in replying was unintentional, with the petition fee and the required reply. (The older 'unavoidable' standard has been eliminated for most purposes.)

  13. What three things must accompany a petition to revive an abandoned application under 37 CFR 1.137?

    (1) The required reply (e.g., the proper response to the outstanding action or the issue fee), unless previously filed; (2) the petition fee; and (3) a statement that the entire delay from the due date until filing the petition was unintentional (the Office may require additional info to question that statement).

  14. What is a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) under 37 CFR 1.114?

    A request to continue prosecution of the same application after prosecution is closed (e.g., after final rejection or a Notice of Allowance), accomplished by filing the RCE, a submission (such as an amendment, IDS, or arguments), and the fee—reopening prosecution without filing a new application.

  15. What three requirements must be met to obtain an RCE?

    (1) Prosecution must be closed (after final rejection, Notice of Allowance, or appeal); (2) a submission (amendment, new argument, IDS, or other reply); and (3) payment of the RCE fee—all filed before the period for reply expires or before abandonment/payment of issue fee (or with a petition).

  16. For what types of applications is an RCE NOT available?

    RCE is not available for provisional applications, utility/plant applications filed before June 8, 1995, design applications, international (PCT) applications that have not entered the national stage, or patents under reexamination. (Design applications use a CPA instead.)

  17. Does filing an RCE require a new filing date or a new oath/declaration?

    No. An RCE continues the same application, retaining the original filing date, serial number, and oath/declaration; it is not a new application and does not require a new declaration.

  18. What is a Notice of Allowance (and Fee(s) Due), and what deadline does it set?

    It notifies the applicant that the application is allowed and states the issue fee (and any publication fee) due. The issue fee must be paid within 3 months from the mailing date—a non-extendable period; failure to pay results in abandonment.

  19. Is the 3-month period to pay the issue fee extendable under 37 CFR 1.136(a)?

    No. The 3-month period to pay the issue fee is statutory and non-extendable. Late payment requires a petition to revive (unintentional delay) under 37 CFR 1.137 with the fee and statement.

  20. What is an amendment after allowance under 37 CFR 1.312?

    An amendment filed after the Notice of Allowance but before/with payment of the issue fee. It is not a matter of right; it requires a showing of good and sufficient reasons why it is needed and was not earlier presented, and must be approved by the examiner for entry.

  21. What must a 37 CFR 1.312 amendment include to be considered, and when must it be filed?

    It must be filed before or with payment of the issue fee (preferably as early as possible), include a showing of why the amendment is necessary and why it wasn't presented earlier, and comply with 1.121 formatting; entry is at the examiner's discretion and may require approval of supervisory personnel for substantive changes.

  22. After the issue fee is paid, what is required to withdraw an application from issue?

    A petition under 37 CFR 1.313(c) showing one of the specified reasons—e.g., unpatentability of a claim, consideration of an RCE, or express abandonment to permit filing a continuation—filed before the patent issues; the Office grants withdrawal at its discretion.

  23. What is the term of a utility patent filed on or after June 8, 1995?

    20 years measured from the earliest effective U.S. filing date of the (non-provisional) application to which priority/benefit is claimed under 35 U.S.C. 120/121/365(c)/386(c)—subject to payment of maintenance fees and possible patent term adjustment/extension.

  24. How do provisional applications and foreign priority dates affect the 20-year patent term?

    They do NOT shorten the term. The 20-year term runs from the earliest U.S. nonprovisional filing date; the provisional filing date (35 U.S.C. 119(e)) and foreign priority dates (35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d)) are not used to measure term, only for priority of subject matter.

  25. What is Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) versus Patent Term Extension (PTE)?

    PTA (35 U.S.C. 154(b)) adds days to compensate for certain USPTO examination delays, reduced by applicant delays. PTE (35 U.S.C. 156) extends term to compensate for regulatory review delay (e.g., FDA approval) for certain products. They address different delays and are calculated separately.

  26. What are the requirements for a domestic benefit claim of an earlier nonprovisional under 35 U.S.C. 120?

    (1) The later application must be filed before the patenting/abandonment of the prior application (copendency); (2) common inventor/joint inventor; (3) a specific reference to the prior application; and (4) the claimed subject matter must be supported under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) in the prior application. The benefit reference must be timely made (in an ADS).

  27. What are the requirements to claim benefit of a provisional application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e)?

    (1) The nonprovisional must be filed within 12 months of the provisional's filing date (extendable by restoration up to 14 months); (2) at least one common inventor; (3) a specific reference to the provisional; and (4) 35 U.S.C. 112(a) support in the provisional for the claimed subject matter.

  28. What are the requirements for claiming foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d)?

    (1) The U.S. application is filed within 12 months (6 months for designs) of the first-filed foreign application in a recognized (Paris Convention/WTO) country; (2) the foreign country grants similar rights to U.S. applicants; (3) a claim for priority is made and a certified copy of the foreign application is filed; and (4) common applicant/inventor and the same invention.

  29. What is the deadline to file the priority claim and certified copy for a 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d) foreign priority claim in an AIA application?

    The priority claim (in an ADS) and the certified copy must generally be filed within the later of 4 months from the actual U.S. filing date or 16 months from the foreign filing date; late claims require a petition for an unintentionally delayed priority claim under 37 CFR 1.55.

  30. What is a foreign filing license, and when is it required?

    Under 35 U.S.C. 184, a license from the USPTO is required before filing a patent application abroad on an invention made in the U.S. (unless 6 months have passed since the U.S. filing without a secrecy order). Filing a U.S. application is treated as a petition for a license, often granted on the filing receipt.

  31. What is the consequence of filing abroad without a required foreign filing license?

    Under 35 U.S.C. 185, an unlicensed foreign filing (when a license was required and not obtained, and the filing was not inadvertent and promptly cured) can render the resulting U.S. patent invalid; a retroactive foreign filing license may be petitioned for under 37 CFR 5.25 if the error was unintentional.

  32. What is a secrecy order, and what is its effect on prosecution and foreign filing?

    Under 35 U.S.C. 181, when disclosure of an invention would be detrimental to national security, the Commissioner issues a secrecy order that withholds publication/grant, bars disclosure, and prohibits foreign filing while the order is in effect; the order is reviewed periodically (typically renewed annually).

  33. What is restoration of the right of priority/benefit (the 'two-month' rule), and what is required?

    If a nonprovisional (or PCT national stage) is filed after the 12-month (or 6-month design) priority deadline but within 2 additional months (i.e., up to 14/8 months), the priority/benefit claim may be restored by petition under 37 CFR 1.55/1.78 with the fee and a statement that the delay in filing was unintentional.

  34. How does restoration of priority interact with the 20-year patent term?

    Restoration only restores the right to claim priority/benefit for prior-art and entitlement purposes; it does not change term measurement. The 20-year term still runs from the earliest U.S. nonprovisional filing date, and the restored foreign/provisional priority date does not affect term.

Patent Bar Examination (USPTO Registration Exam) Patent Prosecution and Examination Procedure FAQ

What is in the Patent Bar Examination (USPTO Registration Exam) Patent Prosecution and Examination Procedure syllabus?

Patent Bar Examination (USPTO Registration Exam) Patent Prosecution and Examination Procedure is split into 5 chapters: The Examination Process, Responding to Office Actions, Time Periods, Extensions, and Abandonment, Continued Examination and Allowance and Priority, Benefit, and Foreign Filing. Together they contain 20 topics and 11 sub-topics.

How many chapters are in Patent Bar Examination (USPTO Registration Exam) Patent Prosecution and Examination Procedure?

5 chapters, containing 20 topics and 11 sub-topics. The largest chapter is The Examination Process, with 4 topics.

Are there flashcards for Patent Bar Examination (USPTO Registration Exam) Patent Prosecution and Examination Procedure?

Yes — a 54-card Patent Prosecution and Examination Procedure deck, printed in full in the flashcards section of this page and available in the Examius app with spaced repetition. The free plan covers one exam of your choice, including its flashcards; Examius Pro, a one-time purchase, unlocks every other exam and deck.