๐ต๐ฐ NTS NAT-ICOM ยท subject
NTS NAT-ICOM Analytical Reasoning Syllabus
The Analytical Reasoning syllabus for NTS NAT-ICOM in full: 4 chapters and 17 topics, every one listed below, plus 51 Analytical Reasoning flashcards with answers.
Analytical Reasoning syllabus: all 4 chapters
Expand any chapter to see its topics and sub-topics.
-
Logical Reasoning
5 topics- Statement and Assumptions
- Statement and Conclusions
- Cause and Effect
- Strengthening and Weakening Arguments
- Course of Action
-
Scenario-Based Reasoning
4 topics- Seating Arrangements
- Ordering and Sequencing
- Grouping and Selection
- Conditional Relationships
-
Logical Deductions
4 topics- Syllogisms
- Venn Diagram Logic
- Blood Relations
- Direction Sense
-
Coding and Pattern Recognition
4 topics- Coding and Decoding
- Series Completion
- Analogical Patterns
- Classification and Odd-One-Out
NTS NAT-ICOM Analytical Reasoning flashcards โ 51 questions with answers
In Statement and Assumptions questions, what is an assumption?
An assumption is something taken for granted or supposed to be true โ an unstated idea that the speaker presumes while making the statement. It must be implicit (hidden), not explicitly stated.
What is the basic rule for deciding whether an assumption is implicit in a statement?
An assumption is implicit only if the statement cannot hold true or make sense without it. If the statement still stands without the assumption, it is NOT implicit.
Why are assumptions that are 'too obvious' or 'universally known facts' usually rejected as NOT implicit?
Because the statement does not need to presume them โ they are general knowledge, not specific suppositions made by the speaker for that particular statement.
In assumption questions, why is an assumption that merely restates the statement rejected?
A restatement is given information, not an unstated supposition. An assumption must be hidden/implied, so anything directly contained in the statement cannot be an assumption.
When a notice/advertisement/appeal is given, what assumption is generally considered implicit?
That the medium used will reach the target audience and that people will read/respond to it; i.e., the action taken is presumed to be effective and noticed.
Define 'conclusion' in Statement and Conclusions questions.
A conclusion is a judgment, opinion, or inference that can be logically and definitely drawn from the information given in the statement(s), without adding outside knowledge.
What is the key test for a valid conclusion in Statement and Conclusions questions?
The conclusion must necessarily follow from the given statement(s) alone. If it requires extra assumptions or external information, it does not follow.
How does a conclusion differ from an assumption?
An assumption is an UNSTATED idea presumed BEFORE/within the statement; a conclusion is an inference logically derived AFTER/from the statement. Assumption precedes, conclusion follows.
In 'Either/Or' conclusion problems, when do you mark 'Either I or II follows'?
When both conclusions individually do not follow, but together they exhaust all possibilities (are complementary) and at least one must be true, e.g., contradictory pairs covering the same subject.
Define Cause and Effect in analytical reasoning.
A cause is an event/condition that produces a result; the effect is the result produced. The cause must occur before the effect, and the effect depends on the cause.
What are the main categories used to classify two events in Cause and Effect questions?
(1) One is cause, other is effect; (2) both are effects of a common/independent cause; (3) both are independent causes; (4) one is the immediate cause and the other the principal/remote cause; (5) effects of independent causes.
In Cause and Effect, what does it mean if 'both statements are effects of a common cause'?
Neither event causes the other; instead, some third underlying factor produces both events independently. They are correlated but not causally linked to each other.
What is the difference between an immediate cause and a principal (remote) cause?
The immediate cause is the direct, proximate trigger of the effect; the principal/remote cause is the deeper, root underlying reason. Both can produce the same effect at different levels.
Why does correlation not imply causation in Cause and Effect reasoning?
Two events occurring together may both stem from a third common cause, or be coincidental. Temporal sequence and a real dependency are needed to establish true causation.
In argument evaluation, what makes an argument 'strong'?
A strong argument is both relevant to the question and addresses its real, substantial, practical aspect โ it carries genuine weight and is directly related to the issue.
In argument evaluation, what makes an argument 'weak'?
A weak argument is irrelevant, ambiguous, superficial, trivial, based on individual/personal opinion, or addresses a minor/illusory aspect rather than the main issue.
What does it mean to 'strengthen' an argument?
To provide additional evidence, a fact, or reasoning that makes the conclusion MORE likely to be true or supports the assumption on which the argument rests.
What does it mean to 'weaken' an argument?
To provide a fact or reasoning that makes the conclusion LESS likely, attacks the underlying assumption, offers an alternative explanation, or shows the evidence is insufficient.
Which statement type most effectively weakens an argument?
One that attacks/negates the key assumption the argument depends on, or supplies an alternative cause/explanation for the observed result.
Why is an answer choice that is true but irrelevant to the conclusion neither a strengthener nor a weakener?
Strengthening/weakening requires affecting the link between premises and conclusion. A statement outside the argument's scope leaves the conclusion's likelihood unchanged.
Show the other 31 Analytical Reasoning flashcards
In Course of Action questions, what is a 'course of action'?
A course of action is an administrative or practical step recommended for improvement, follow-up, or to solve a problem mentioned in the statement.
What two conditions must a suggested course of action satisfy to be considered valid (to 'follow')?
(1) It must logically relate to and address the problem in the statement, and (2) it must be practical, effective, and likely to produce the desired result.
In Course of Action questions, why are extreme or impractical actions usually rejected?
Because they are not feasible or proportionate; a valid course of action must be reasonable, implementable, and likely to actually solve the stated problem.
In linear Seating Arrangement (single row), how do 'left' and 'right' work when people face the same direction (e.g., facing north)?
When all face north, a person's left is the solver's left and their right is the solver's right โ directions match the reader's perspective. (If they face south, left and right reverse.)
In a circular Seating Arrangement where everyone faces the CENTER, how do left and right run?
Facing center, each person's left-hand side is the clockwise direction and right-hand side is anticlockwise (opposite to a normal clockwise reading).
In a circular arrangement where everyone faces OUTWARD (away from center), how do left and right run?
Facing outward, each person's left is anticlockwise and right is clockwise โ the reverse of facing-center arrangements.
How do you count people sitting 'between' two persons in a circular arrangement?
Count the seats along the specified direction (clockwise or anticlockwise) from one person to the other, excluding the two endpoints; both arcs may need checking unless direction is fixed.
In Ordering and Sequencing, what is the difference between 'rank from the top/start' and 'rank from the bottom/end'?
Rank from top counts position from the highest/first; rank from bottom counts from the lowest/last. Together they describe the same item from opposite ends of the order.
What is the formula for the total number of items in a row given a person's position from both ends?
Total = (position from left) + (position from right) โ 1. The โ1 avoids counting that person twice.
If a person ranks Mth from the top and Nth from the bottom in a class, how many students are there in total?
Total students = M + N โ 1.
How do you find a person's position from the other end given total count and position from one end?
Position from other end = Total โ position from given end + 1.
In comparison/ranking puzzles, what does the relation 'A > B > C' establish about A and C?
Transitivity gives A > C: A is greater/higher than C. Chained inequalities in the same direction can be combined directly.
In Grouping and Selection problems, what do 'conditional selection' rules typically specify?
They specify which items must be chosen together, which cannot be chosen together (mutual exclusion), and which require another item's presence/absence โ constraints governing valid group formation.
In Grouping/Selection, how do you handle a rule like 'If A is selected, then B must also be selected'?
Treat it as a conditional: whenever A is in the group, B is forced in. By contrapositive, if B is NOT selected, then A cannot be selected either.
What is the contrapositive of the conditional statement 'If P then Q'?
'If not Q then not P' โ logically equivalent to the original statement and always true when the original is true.
In Conditional Relationships, what does the converse of 'If P then Q' state, and is it equivalent?
The converse is 'If Q then P.' It is NOT logically equivalent to the original; the truth of a conditional does not guarantee the truth of its converse.
In Conditional Relationships, what does the inverse of 'If P then Q' state, and is it equivalent?
The inverse is 'If not P then not Q.' It is NOT logically equivalent to the original statement (it IS equivalent to the converse).
What is the valid argument form modus ponens?
Given 'If P then Q' and 'P is true,' you may validly conclude 'Q is true.' (Affirming the antecedent.)
What is the valid argument form modus tollens?
Given 'If P then Q' and 'Q is false (not Q),' you may validly conclude 'P is false (not P).' (Denying the consequent.)
Name the two classic logical fallacies tied to conditional statements.
Affirming the consequent (PโQ, Q, therefore P โ invalid) and denying the antecedent (PโQ, not P, therefore not Q โ invalid).
What is a syllogism?
A syllogism is a form of deductive reasoning with two premises and a conclusion, relating categories using quantifiers (All, Some, No), where the conclusion must follow from the premises.
What are the four standard categorical (A, E, I, O) propositions in syllogisms?
A = Universal affirmative ('All S are P'); E = Universal negative ('No S is P'); I = Particular affirmative ('Some S are P'); O = Particular negative ('Some S are not P').
State the rule for combining 'All A are B' and 'All B are C' in syllogisms.
The valid conclusion is 'All A are C.' (Two universal affirmatives in a chain give a universal affirmative conclusion.)
What conclusion follows from 'All A are B' and 'No B is C'?
'No A is C' follows. (Universal affirmative + universal negative in chain yields a universal negative.)
Why do two particular premises (both 'Some...') in a syllogism yield no definite conclusion?
A valid syllogistic conclusion requires at least one universal premise; two particular premises do not distribute the middle term, so no certain conclusion can be drawn.
In syllogisms, what is the 'possibility' rule for converting 'Some A are B'?
'Some A are B' implies 'Some B are A' (valid conversion of I-type). It also leaves open the possibility that 'All A are B' or 'All B are A' could be true.
In Venn diagram logic, how is 'All A are B' represented?
Circle A is drawn entirely inside circle B (A is a subset of B). Every element of A lies within B.
In Venn diagram logic, how is 'No A is B' represented?
Circles A and B are drawn completely separate with no overlap (disjoint sets) โ they share no common region.
In Venn diagram logic, how are 'Some A are B' and 'Some A are not B' represented?
'Some A are B' = two partially overlapping circles (a shared region exists). 'Some A are not B' = part of A lies outside B; the circles overlap but A has a region beyond B.
In Blood Relations, what relation is 'my father's sister' and 'my mother's brother'?
Father's sister = paternal aunt; mother's brother = maternal uncle.
In Blood Relations coding, how do you decode 'A is the son of B's father's only son'?
B's father's only son is B himself (assuming B is male), so A is the son of B โ meaning B is A's father. (If B's gender is unspecified, B's father's only son is B's brother or B.)
NTS NAT-ICOM Analytical Reasoning FAQ
What is in the NTS NAT-ICOM Analytical Reasoning syllabus?
NTS NAT-ICOM Analytical Reasoning is split into 4 chapters: Logical Reasoning, Scenario-Based Reasoning, Logical Deductions and Coding and Pattern Recognition. Together they contain 17 topics.
How many chapters are in NTS NAT-ICOM Analytical Reasoning?
4 chapters, containing 17 topics. The largest chapter is Logical Reasoning, with 5 topics.
Are there flashcards for NTS NAT-ICOM Analytical Reasoning?
Yes โ a 51-card Analytical Reasoning deck, printed in full in the flashcards section of this page and available in the Examius app with spaced repetition. The free plan covers one exam of your choice, including its flashcards; Examius Pro, a one-time purchase, unlocks every other exam and deck.