🇺🇸 Master of Laws (LLM) · subject
Master of Laws (LLM) Evidence and Property Law Syllabus
The Evidence and Property Law syllabus for Master of Laws (LLM) in full: 4 chapters, 14 topics and 10 sub-topics, every one listed below, plus 59 Evidence and Property Law flashcards with answers.
Evidence and Property Law syllabus: all 4 chapters
Expand any chapter to see its topics and sub-topics.
-
Relevance and Admissibility
3 topics- Relevance Standards
- Logical and legal relevance
- Rule 403 balancing of probative value vs. prejudice
- Character Evidence and Prior Bad Acts
- Habit, Subsequent Remedial Measures, and Policy Exclusions
- Relevance Standards
-
Witnesses, Hearsay, and Authentication
4 topics- The Hearsay Rule
- Definition and non-hearsay uses
- Exceptions: present sense impression, excited utterance, business records
- Confrontation Clause and testimonial statements
- Competency, Impeachment, and Rehabilitation of Witnesses
- Lay and Expert Opinion Testimony (Daubert)
- Privileges and Authentication of Evidence
- The Hearsay Rule
-
Ownership and Estates in Land
3 topics- Present and Future Interests
- Fee simple, life estates, and defeasible fees
- Remainders, reversions, and executory interests
- Rule against perpetuities
- Concurrent Ownership: Joint Tenancy and Tenancy in Common
- Landlord-Tenant Law and Leasehold Interests
- Present and Future Interests
-
Conveyancing and Land Use
4 topics- Transfers of Real Property
- Deeds, delivery, and recording acts
- Title assurance and the bona fide purchaser
- Easements, Covenants, and Servitudes
- Mortgages and Security Interests in Real Estate
- Adverse Possession and Zoning
- Transfers of Real Property
Master of Laws (LLM) Evidence and Property Law flashcards — 59 questions with answers
Under FRE 401, what is the test for whether evidence is relevant?
Evidence is relevant if it has any tendency to make a fact of consequence more or less probable than it would be without the evidence (probative value) and the fact is of consequence to the action (materiality).
Under FRE 403, when may a court exclude relevant evidence?
When its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence.
What is the general rule on admissibility of character evidence under FRE 404(a)?
Evidence of a person's character or character trait is not admissible to prove that on a particular occasion the person acted in accordance with that character (propensity).
Under FRE 404(b), for what non-propensity purposes may prior bad acts be admitted?
For purposes such as motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, absence of mistake, or lack of accident (mnemonic: MIMIC / KIPPOMIA).
In a criminal case, who may first open the door to a defendant's character evidence and how is it proved?
The defendant may introduce evidence of a pertinent good character trait; under FRE 405(a) it is proved by reputation or opinion testimony. Once opened, the prosecution may rebut, including with specific-act cross-examination.
When is character provable by specific instances of conduct under FRE 405(b)?
Only when a person's character or character trait is an essential element of a charge, claim, or defense (e.g., defamation, negligent entrustment, entrapment).
Under FRE 413-415, how is the propensity bar modified in sexual-assault and child-molestation cases?
Evidence of the defendant's prior similar sexual-assault or child-molestation offenses IS admissible and may be considered for any matter, including propensity to commit the charged offense.
Under FRE 406, how does habit evidence differ from character evidence in admissibility?
Habit (a person's regular, semi-automatic response to a specific situation) and an organization's routine practice ARE admissible to prove conduct in conformity, and need no corroboration or eyewitness.
Under FRE 407, why are subsequent remedial measures excluded, and for what purposes may they still be admitted?
Excluded to encourage safety improvements; not admissible to prove negligence, defect, or need for warning. They may be admitted to prove ownership, control, or feasibility (if disputed), or for impeachment.
Under FRE 408, what does the compromise-offers exclusion bar?
Evidence of offering, accepting, or promising consideration to compromise a disputed claim—and statements made during negotiations—is inadmissible to prove validity/amount of the claim or to impeach by prior inconsistent statement.
Under FRE 409 and 411, what two policy exclusions apply to payments and insurance?
FRE 409: offers to pay medical/hospital expenses are not admissible to prove liability. FRE 411: evidence of liability insurance is not admissible to prove negligence/wrongdoing (but may show agency, ownership, control, or bias).
What is the definition of hearsay under FRE 801(c)?
An out-of-court statement (oral, written, or assertive conduct by a declarant) offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.
Name three categories of out-of-court statements that are NOT hearsay because not offered for their truth.
Statements offered to show effect on the listener, verbal acts/legally operative words (e.g., contract terms, defamation), and circumstantial evidence of the declarant's state of mind or knowledge.
Under FRE 801(d)(1), which prior statements of a testifying witness are defined as non-hearsay?
Prior inconsistent statements made under oath at a proceeding, prior consistent statements offered to rebut a charge of recent fabrication/improper motive or to rehabilitate, and statements of prior identification.
Under FRE 801(d)(2), what are the categories of opposing-party statements (admissions)?
The party's own statement, an adopted statement, an authorized statement, a statement by an agent/employee on a matter within scope during employment, and a co-conspirator's statement made during and in furtherance of the conspiracy.
Which hearsay exceptions under FRE 803 do NOT require the declarant to be unavailable? Name four.
Present sense impression, excited utterance, then-existing mental/emotional/physical condition, statements for medical diagnosis/treatment, recorded recollection, and business/public records (among others).
Compare present sense impression and excited utterance under FRE 803(1)-(2).
Present sense impression: describes an event while or immediately after perceiving it (no stress required). Excited utterance: relates to a startling event made while under the stress of excitement it caused (timing more flexible if stress persists).
Under FRE 804, which hearsay exceptions require the declarant to be unavailable? Name four.
Former testimony, dying declaration (statement under belief of imminent death), statement against interest, statement of personal/family history, and statement offered against a party that wrongfully caused the declarant's unavailability (forfeiture).
What are the requirements for the dying-declaration exception under FRE 804(b)(2)?
Declarant must be unavailable, believe death is imminent, and the statement must concern the cause or circumstances of what the declarant believed to be impending death. Admissible in civil cases and homicide prosecutions only.
What does the Confrontation Clause (Crawford v. Washington) bar in criminal cases?
Admission of testimonial hearsay against a criminal defendant unless the declarant is unavailable AND the defendant had a prior opportunity to cross-examine, regardless of any hearsay exception.
Show the other 39 Evidence and Property Law flashcards
Under FRE 601, what is the modern rule on witness competency?
Every person is presumed competent to be a witness. The witness need only have personal knowledge (FRE 602) and take an oath/affirmation to testify truthfully (FRE 603).
List the major methods of impeaching a witness's credibility.
Prior inconsistent statements, bias/interest/motive, sensory/mental defect, bad character for truthfulness (reputation/opinion or specific acts), prior convictions, and contradiction.
Under FRE 609, when may a prior conviction be used to impeach?
Any crime involving a dishonest act/false statement is automatically admissible (no balancing). Other felonies: admissible subject to FRE 403 balancing (or a special heightened test if the witness is the criminal defendant). Convictions older than 10 years are generally inadmissible.
Under FRE 608(b), how may specific instances of a witness's conduct be used to attack character for truthfulness?
They may be inquired into on cross-examination (in the court's discretion) if probative of truthfulness, but extrinsic evidence is not admissible to prove them—the cross-examiner is stuck with the answer.
How may a witness's credibility be rehabilitated after impeachment?
By showing good character for truthfulness (FRE 608(a)) only after the witness's character was attacked, by prior consistent statements (FRE 801(d)(1)(B)) to rebut a charge of recent fabrication/improper motive, or by explanation/redirect.
Under FRE 701, what limits lay opinion testimony?
Lay opinion must be rationally based on the witness's perception, helpful to understanding testimony or determining a fact, and not based on scientific/technical/specialized knowledge.
What are the four reliability factors articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow for expert scientific testimony?
(1) Whether the theory/technique can be and has been tested; (2) peer review and publication; (3) known or potential error rate (and standards controlling operation); (4) general acceptance in the relevant scientific community.
State the FRE 702 requirements for admitting expert testimony.
The expert must be qualified by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education; the testimony must help the trier of fact; be based on sufficient facts/data; be the product of reliable principles and methods; and reliably apply those methods to the facts.
How does Daubert differ from the older Frye standard, and what did Kumho Tire add?
Frye required only 'general acceptance.' Daubert makes the trial judge a flexible gatekeeper assessing reliability via multiple factors. Kumho Tire extended Daubert's gatekeeping to all expert testimony, including technical and experience-based.
What are the elements of the attorney-client privilege?
A confidential communication between a client (or prospective client) and an attorney (or their representatives) made for the purpose of obtaining legal advice; the privilege belongs to and is asserted by the client, and survives the client's death.
Name the crime-fraud exception and two other limits on the attorney-client privilege.
Crime-fraud exception: no privilege where the client sought advice to further a future crime or fraud. Also lost by waiver (voluntary disclosure to third parties) and inapplicable to communications relevant to attorney-client fee disputes or where the communication was not confidential.
Under FRE 901, what is required to authenticate evidence?
Proof sufficient to support a finding that the item is what the proponent claims it is. Methods include witness testimony, distinctive characteristics, comparison by expert/trier, voice/handwriting identification, and the chain of custody.
Which items are self-authenticating under FRE 902 (give three examples)?
Domestic/foreign public documents under seal, certified copies of public records, official publications, newspapers/periodicals, trade inscriptions/labels, acknowledged (notarized) documents, and certified business records.
Define a fee simple absolute and the words traditionally used to create it.
The largest possible estate in land—of potentially infinite duration, fully alienable, devisable, and inheritable. Modern: 'to A.' Common law required 'to A and his heirs.'
Compare a fee simple determinable with a fee simple subject to a condition subsequent.
Determinable: created by durational language ('so long as,' 'until'); automatically reverts to grantor via a possibility of reverter. Condition subsequent: created by conditional language ('but if,' 'provided that'); grantor must exercise a right of entry/power of termination—not automatic.
Distinguish a remainder from an executory interest.
A remainder is a future interest in a third party that becomes possessory naturally at the end of a prior estate (no cutting short). An executory interest cuts short a prior estate or the grantor's interest (springing from grantor or shifting from another transferee).
Distinguish a vested remainder from a contingent remainder.
A vested remainder is held by an ascertained person with no condition precedent. A contingent remainder is given to an unascertained person OR subject to a condition precedent.
State the Rule Against Perpetuities.
No interest is valid unless it must vest, if at all, no later than 21 years after the death of some life in being at the creation of the interest. Applies to contingent remainders, executory interests, vested remainders subject to open, options, and rights of first refusal.
What are the three concurrent estates and their key distinguishing feature?
Joint tenancy (right of survivorship), tenancy in common (no survivorship; freely transferable separate shares), and tenancy by the entirety (survivorship between married spouses with creditor/transfer protections).
What are the four unities required to create a joint tenancy?
Time, Title, Interest, and Possession (mnemonic: T-TIP). All joint tenants must take their interests at the same time, by the same instrument, with equal interests, and with an equal right to possess the whole.
What severs a joint tenancy, and what is the result?
An inter vivos conveyance by one joint tenant (or in many states a mortgage in title-theory states, or a contract of sale) severs as to that share, destroying the right of survivorship; the new owner holds as a tenant in common with the remaining co-owners.
Define a tenancy in common and its default presumption.
Two or more owners with separate but undivided interests, each with the right to possess the whole; no right of survivorship; shares are devisable, descendible, and alienable. It is the modern default presumption for multiple grantees.
List and distinguish the four leasehold (nonfreehold) estates.
Tenancy for years (fixed term, ends automatically), periodic tenancy (renews until proper notice), tenancy at will (no fixed period, terminable by either party), and tenancy at sufferance (holdover tenant wrongfully remaining).
Compare the implied warranty of habitability with the covenant of quiet enjoyment.
Implied warranty of habitability (residential, nonwaivable) requires premises fit for human habitation; tenant may withhold rent, repair-and-deduct, or terminate. Quiet enjoyment (residential and commercial) protects against actual or constructive eviction interfering with the tenant's use.
Distinguish an assignment from a sublease.
Assignment: tenant transfers the entire remaining lease interest; assignee is in privity of estate with the landlord and liable for rent. Sublease: tenant transfers less than the entire interest, retaining a reversion; subtenant is not in privity with the landlord.
What are the two implied covenants in every land-sale contract regarding the condition of title and disclosure?
An implied covenant of marketable title (title free from reasonable doubt of litigation—no significant encumbrances/defects at closing) and, in most states, a duty to disclose known latent material defects.
List the three types of deeds and the title assurance each provides.
General warranty deed (warrants against all defects, including those of prior owners—six covenants of title). Special/limited warranty deed (warrants only against defects arising during the grantor's ownership). Quitclaim deed (no warranties—conveys whatever interest the grantor has).
What are the requirements for a valid delivery of a deed?
The grantor must have present intent to make the deed immediately effective (pass title now). Delivery is presumed by physical handover, recording, or notarization; it cannot be conditioned orally on the grantor's death (would be a void oral condition).
Compare race, notice, and race-notice recording statutes.
Race: first to record wins (notice irrelevant). Notice: a subsequent bona fide purchaser without notice prevails over a prior unrecorded interest. Race-notice: a subsequent BFP prevails only if without notice AND records first.
Distinguish an easement appurtenant from an easement in gross.
Appurtenant: benefits the holder in use of a particular parcel (dominant estate); runs with the land to successors. In gross: benefits a person/entity regardless of land ownership (e.g., utility lines); historically not transferable unless commercial.
How is an easement by implication (prior use) created, versus an easement by necessity?
Implication by prior use: at severance of commonly owned land there was a prior apparent, continuous use reasonably necessary to enjoyment of the dominant parcel. By necessity: severance leaves a parcel landlocked (strict necessity for access).
What are the requirements for the burden of a real covenant to run with the land at law?
Writing, intent to bind successors, touch and concern the land, horizontal privity (shared interest at the covenant's creation) AND vertical privity (succession to the entire estate), and notice to the burdened successor.
Compare a real covenant with an equitable servitude.
A real covenant is enforced at law by money damages and requires horizontal and vertical privity. An equitable servitude is enforced in equity by injunction, requires only intent, touch and concern, and notice (no privity required); it can arise from a common scheme.
Distinguish lien-theory from title-theory states regarding mortgages.
Lien theory (majority): the mortgagee holds only a lien; the mortgagor retains title and right to possession until foreclosure. Title theory (minority): the mortgagee holds legal title and may take possession; a mortgage by one joint tenant can sever the joint tenancy.
What is an equity of redemption and a statutory right of redemption?
Equity of redemption: the mortgagor's right to redeem the property by paying the full debt before the foreclosure sale (cannot be clogged). Statutory redemption: in some states, the right to redeem for a set period AFTER the foreclosure sale by paying the sale price.
How are proceeds and priorities handled in a mortgage foreclosure?
Foreclosure sale proceeds pay foreclosure costs, then the foreclosing lien, then junior interests in priority order; surplus goes to the mortgagor. Junior interests are extinguished; senior interests survive. Priority generally follows 'first in time, first in right,' subject to recording acts and purchase-money mortgage priority.
What are the elements of adverse possession?
Possession that is (1) actual, (2) open and notorious, (3) hostile/adverse (without owner's permission), (4) exclusive, and (5) continuous for the statutory period. (Some states add a claim of right or payment of taxes.)
What is tacking in adverse possession, and what tolls the statutory period?
Tacking allows successive adverse possessors in privity (deed, will, descent) to combine their possession periods. The statute is tolled (paused) by disabilities of the true owner existing at the start—e.g., minority, insanity, imprisonment.
What is the distinction between Euclidean zoning and a variance, and what is a nonconforming use?
Euclidean zoning divides land into use districts (residential/commercial/industrial). A variance permits a use that deviates from zoning (showing undue hardship and no harm to the public). A nonconforming use is a lawful use predating the zoning ordinance that is allowed to continue (vested right).
Master of Laws (LLM) Evidence and Property Law FAQ
What is in the Master of Laws (LLM) Evidence and Property Law syllabus?
Master of Laws (LLM) Evidence and Property Law is split into 4 chapters: Relevance and Admissibility, Witnesses, Hearsay, and Authentication, Ownership and Estates in Land and Conveyancing and Land Use. Together they contain 14 topics and 10 sub-topics.
How many chapters are in Master of Laws (LLM) Evidence and Property Law?
4 chapters, containing 14 topics and 10 sub-topics. The largest chapter is Witnesses, Hearsay, and Authentication, with 4 topics.
Are there flashcards for Master of Laws (LLM) Evidence and Property Law?
Yes — a 59-card Evidence and Property Law deck, printed in full in the flashcards section of this page and available in the Examius app with spaced repetition. The free plan covers one exam of your choice, including its flashcards; Examius Pro, a one-time purchase, unlocks every other exam and deck.