๐ GMAT ยท subject
GMAT Verbal Reasoning Syllabus
The Verbal Reasoning syllabus for GMAT in full: 3 chapters and 10 topics, every one listed below, plus 51 Verbal Reasoning flashcards with answers.
Verbal Reasoning syllabus: all 3 chapters
Expand any chapter to see its topics and sub-topics.
-
Reading Comprehension
4 topics- Understanding main ideas
- Identifying supporting details
- Drawing inferences
- Analyzing the author's tone
-
Critical Reasoning
3 topics- Identifying assumptions
- Strengthening and weakening arguments
- Evaluating arguments
-
Sentence Correction
3 topics- Grammar rules
- Sentence structure
- Punctuation and diction
GMAT Verbal Reasoning flashcards โ 51 questions with answers
What is the "main idea" of a passage in GMAT Reading Comprehension?
The central point or overall message the author is trying to convey โ the single controlling thought that all other sentences support. It is usually broader than any one detail but narrower than the general topic.
How does a passage's "topic" differ from its "main idea"?
The topic is the general subject the passage is about (a word or phrase), while the main idea is the specific claim or point the author makes about that topic (a full assertion).
Where in a passage is the main idea most commonly located?
Most often in the first paragraph (a thesis or topic sentence) and reinforced in the concluding paragraph; in inductive passages it may appear at the end after evidence is presented.
What is a reliable technique for finding the main idea when it is not explicitly stated?
Ask what point all the paragraphs collectively support; summarize each paragraph in a few words, then combine them into one sentence that captures the author's overall purpose.
On the GMAT, why is the correct "main idea" answer usually NOT the most extreme option?
Correct main-idea answers must cover the whole passage without overstating it; extreme, too-narrow, or too-broad choices distort scope, so the credited answer is comprehensive yet moderate.
What are "supporting details" in a passage?
Specific facts, examples, statistics, reasons, definitions, and illustrations the author provides to explain, prove, or develop the main idea.
What is the functional relationship between supporting details and the main idea?
Supporting details serve the main idea โ they justify, clarify, or exemplify it. The main idea answers "what is the point?"; supporting details answer "how do we know?" or "why?"
For a GMAT "detail" (specific-information) question, what is the best strategy?
Return to the passage and locate the exact text that addresses the question; the correct answer paraphrases what is explicitly stated, so answer from the text rather than from memory or outside knowledge.
What signal words often introduce supporting details or examples?
"For example," "for instance," "such as," "specifically," "in particular," "to illustrate," and "namely."
What is an inference in GMAT Reading Comprehension?
A conclusion that must be true based on the stated information โ something not explicitly written but that logically follows with certainty from the passage.
How does a valid GMAT inference differ from an assumption?
An inference follows FROM the passage (it is a downstream, must-be-true conclusion), while an assumption is an unstated premise the author needs (an upstream gap the argument depends on).
What is the key test for eliminating wrong inference answers?
Reject any choice that goes beyond what the text supports; the credited inference must be provable from the passage. If it requires new information or is only "possibly" true, it is wrong.
Why are strongly worded inference choices ("always," "never," "only") usually risky?
They require more evidence to be guaranteed true; the passage rarely supports absolute claims, so moderate, qualified inferences are more often correct.
What is the author's "tone" in a passage?
The author's attitude or feeling toward the subject, conveyed through word choice (diction), revealing whether the author is, e.g., approving, critical, neutral, or skeptical.
Name several common GMAT tone descriptors and their meaning categories.
Positive: approving, optimistic, appreciative. Negative: critical, skeptical, disapproving. Neutral/analytical: objective, analytical, explanatory. Mixed: qualified, cautiously optimistic.
How do you determine an author's tone in a scholarly GMAT passage?
Examine the connotation of adjectives, adverbs, and verbs; note whether the author praises, criticizes, or merely reports. Most GMAT academic passages are analytical or neutral rather than emotional.
Why is an extremely emotional tone answer (e.g., "outraged," "euphoric") usually wrong on the GMAT?
GMAT passages are typically measured and academic, so tone answers describing strong emotion overstate the author's attitude; moderate, analytical descriptors are usually credited.
What is an "assumption" in a GMAT Critical Reasoning argument?
An unstated premise that must be true for the conclusion to follow from the stated evidence โ a hidden logical link the argument depends on.
What is the "Negation Test" (Denial Test) for identifying a necessary assumption?
Negate the answer choice; if negating it makes the argument fall apart (the conclusion can no longer hold), it is the required assumption. If the argument survives negation, it is not necessary.
What is the difference between a necessary assumption and a sufficient assumption?
A necessary assumption must be true for the argument to work (removing it breaks the argument). A sufficient assumption, if added, is enough to guarantee the conclusion but need not itself be required.
Show the other 31 Verbal Reasoning flashcards
In an argument, how do you distinguish the conclusion from the premises?
The conclusion is the main claim being argued for (often signaled by "therefore," "thus," "hence"); premises are the supporting reasons (often signaled by "because," "since," "for"). Ask "what is the author trying to convince me of?"
What does it mean to "strengthen" an argument?
To provide new information that makes the conclusion more likely to follow from the premises โ typically by validating an assumption, ruling out an alternative explanation, or adding supporting evidence.
What does it mean to "weaken" an argument?
To introduce new information that makes the conclusion less likely to follow โ typically by attacking an assumption, offering an alternative cause, or presenting a counterexample.
For a causal argument ("X caused Y"), what is the most common way to weaken it?
Provide an alternative cause for Y, show Y occurred without X, show X occurred without Y, or reveal that the causation is reversed (Y caused X).
For a causal argument ("X caused Y"), how can it be strengthened?
Rule out alternative causes, show that when X is present Y follows, show that without X, Y does not occur, or confirm the direction of causation.
On strengthen/weaken questions, why must you accept the premises as true?
GMAT Critical Reasoning treats stated premises as given facts; you attack or support the LOGICAL LEAP from premises to conclusion (the assumption), not the truth of the premises themselves.
What is a common wrong-answer trap on strengthen questions?
Choices that restate a premise, are irrelevant to the conclusion, or actually weaken the argument. The credited answer must add NEW support that bears directly on the conclusion's logic.
What does an "Evaluate the Argument" question ask you to do?
Identify the piece of information or question whose answer would most help determine whether the argument's conclusion is well supported โ i.e., the issue on which the argument's validity hinges.
What is the "Variance Test" for Evaluate-the-Argument questions?
Test the extremes of the answer's variable: if one extreme strengthens the argument and the other weakens it, that answer is relevant and correct. If both extremes leave the argument unchanged, it is irrelevant.
What is a logical flaw of "circular reasoning"?
When the conclusion is merely a restatement of a premise, so the argument assumes what it is trying to prove and provides no independent support.
What is the "sampling" (unrepresentative sample) flaw in arguments?
Drawing a general conclusion from a sample that is too small or not representative of the whole population, making the generalization unwarranted.
What is the logical flaw of "correlation implies causation"?
Concluding that because two things occur together or in sequence, one must cause the other โ ignoring coincidence, reverse causation, or a common third cause.
In subject-verb agreement, what is the core rule?
A verb must agree with its subject in number: singular subjects take singular verbs, and plural subjects take plural verbs (e.g., "The list of items is long," not "are long").
How do prepositional phrases affect subject-verb agreement?
They do not change the subject's number; ignore the phrase between subject and verb. In "The box of chocolates is here," the subject is "box" (singular), not "chocolates."
How do you determine agreement with "either...or" / "neither...nor" subjects?
The verb agrees with the nearer subject (the noun closest to the verb). E.g., "Neither the manager nor the employees are ready" vs. "Neither the employees nor the manager is ready."
What is the rule for pronoun-antecedent agreement?
A pronoun must agree with its antecedent in number and gender, and the antecedent must be clear and unambiguous. "Each student must bring his or her book" (singular "each" โ singular pronoun).
What is faulty parallelism, and how is it corrected?
Faulty parallelism occurs when items in a list or comparison have mismatched grammatical forms. Correct it by making them parallel: "She likes running, swimming, and biking" (all gerunds), not "running, swimming, and to bike."
What is a dangling (or misplaced) modifier?
A modifier that does not clearly or logically attach to the word it is meant to describe. "Walking to school, the rain started" wrongly implies the rain was walking; fix it: "Walking to school, I was caught in the rain."
What is a run-on sentence (comma splice), and how can it be fixed?
Two independent clauses joined incorrectly (with no punctuation or only a comma). Fix with a period, a semicolon, or a comma plus a coordinating conjunction (FANBOYS).
What are the seven coordinating conjunctions (FANBOYS)?
For, And, Nor, But, Or, Yet, So โ used with a comma to join two independent clauses.
What is a sentence fragment?
A group of words punctuated as a sentence but lacking an independent clause โ missing a subject, a verb, or a complete thought (e.g., "Because she was late.").
What is the difference between an independent and a dependent (subordinate) clause?
An independent clause has a subject and verb and expresses a complete thought (can stand alone). A dependent clause has a subject and verb but begins with a subordinator and cannot stand alone.
When is a semicolon used correctly?
To join two closely related independent clauses without a conjunction ("I was tired; I went to bed"), and to separate list items that themselves contain commas.
When is a colon used correctly?
After a complete independent clause to introduce a list, explanation, or elaboration ("She had one goal: to win"). The words before a colon must form a complete sentence.
How are commas used with non-essential (nonrestrictive) clauses?
Nonrestrictive clauses (extra, removable information) are set off by commas, typically introduced by "which" ("My car, which is red, is fast"). Essential (restrictive) clauses use "that" and take no commas.
What is the difference between "that" and "which" in GMAT usage?
"That" introduces a restrictive (essential) clause with no comma; "which" introduces a nonrestrictive (nonessential) clause set off by commas. "The book that I bought" vs. "The book, which I bought, ..."
How do you correctly use the apostrophe for possession vs. contraction with "its/it's"?
"Its" is the possessive of "it" (no apostrophe): "The dog wagged its tail." "It's" is a contraction of "it is" or "it has." Apostrophes mark contractions and possessives of nouns, not possessive pronouns.
What is the diction distinction between "fewer" and "less"?
Use "fewer" for countable nouns ("fewer cars") and "less" for uncountable/mass nouns ("less water"). GMAT tests this countable vs. uncountable distinction.
What is the diction distinction between "affect" and "effect"?
"Affect" is usually a verb meaning to influence ("The news affected her"); "effect" is usually a noun meaning result ("The effect was clear"). "Effect" can be a verb meaning to bring about ("to effect change").
What is the rule for comparisons using "like" vs. "as"?
Use "like" to compare nouns/pronouns ("She sings like a bird"); use "as" (or "as if") to introduce a clause with a verb ("She sings as a professional does"). GMAT flags "like" before a clause as an error.
What is a logical comparison error, and how do you fix it?
Comparing unlike things (e.g., an action to a person or one country's population to another country). Fix by comparing parallel items: "The population of India is larger than that of Japan," not "than Japan."
GMAT Verbal Reasoning FAQ
What is in the GMAT Verbal Reasoning syllabus?
GMAT Verbal Reasoning is split into 3 chapters: Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning and Sentence Correction. Together they contain 10 topics.
How many chapters are in GMAT Verbal Reasoning?
3 chapters, containing 10 topics. The largest chapter is Reading Comprehension, with 4 topics.
Are there flashcards for GMAT Verbal Reasoning?
Yes โ a 51-card Verbal Reasoning deck, printed in full in the flashcards section of this page and available in the Examius app with spaced repetition. The free plan covers one exam of your choice, including its flashcards; Examius Pro, a one-time purchase, unlocks every other exam and deck.